Coreset selection based on Intra-class diversity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep Learning models have transformed various domains, including the healthcare sector, particularly biomedical image classification by learning intricate features and enabling accurate diagnostics pertaining to complex diseases. Recent studies have adopted two different approaches to train DL models: training from scratch and transfer learning. Both approaches demand substantial computational time and resources due to the involvement of massive datasets in model training. These computational demands are further increased due to the design-space exploration required for selecting optimal hyperparameters, which typically necessitates several training rounds. With the growing sizes of datasets, exploring solutions to this problem has recently gained the research community's attention. A plausible solution is to select a subset of the dataset for training and hyperparameter search. This subset, referred to as the corset, must be a representative set of the original dataset. A straightforward approach to selecting the coreset could be employing random sampling, albeit at the cost of compromising the representativeness of the original dataset. A critical limitation of random sampling is the bias towards the dominant classes in an imbalanced dataset. Even if the dataset has inter-class balance, this random sampling will not capture intra-class diversity. This study addresses this issue by introducing an intelligent, lightweight mechanism for coreset selection. Specifically, it proposes a method to extract intra-class diversity, forming per-class clusters that are utilized for the final sampling. We demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed methodology by conducting extensive classification experiments on a well-known biomedical imaging dataset. Results demonstrate that the proposed scheme outperforms the random sampling approach on several performance metrics for uniform conditions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2025.
Builds on
16 of 36 references.
References · 16
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2020GLISTER: Generalization based Data Subset Selection for Efficient and Robust Learningcited by 226
- 2022DeepCore: A Comprehensive Library for Coreset Selection in Deep Learningcited by 147
- 2017Practical Coreset Constructions for Machine Learningcited by 78
- 2018Bayesian Coreset Construction via Greedy Iterative Geodesic Ascentcited by 68
- 2023Towards Sustainable Learning: Coresets for Data-efficient Deep Learningcited by 44
- 2018Determinantal Point Processes for Coresetscited by 18
- 2023Probabilistic Modeling of Inter- and Intra-observer Variability in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 17
- 2018Learning From Less Data: Diversified Subset Selection and Active Learning in Image Classification Taskscited by 10
4 more
- 2021A Novel Sequential Coreset Method for Gradient Descent Algorithmscited by 7
- 2024Evolution-aware VAriance (EVA) Coreset Selection for Medical Image Classificationcited by 7
- 2022Diversity-Promoting Ensemble for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 3
- 2021Margin-Aware Intra-Class Novelty Identification for Medical Imagescited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.