mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Domain-Informed Genetic Superposition Programming: A Case Study on SFRC Beams

arXiv 2509.21355 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2025cs.NE cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study presents domain-informed genetic superposition programming (DIGSP), a symbolic regression framework tailored for engineering systems governed by separable physical mechanisms. DIGSP partitions the input space into domain-specific feature subsets and evolves independent genetic programming (GP) populations to model material-specific effects. Early evolution occurs in isolation, while ensemble fitness promotes inter-population cooperation. To enable symbolic superposition, an adaptive hierarchical symbolic abstraction mechanism (AHSAM) is triggered after stagnation across all populations. AHSAM performs analysis of variance- (ANOVA) based filtering to identify statistically significant individuals, compresses them into symbolic constructs, and injects them into all populations through a validation-guided pruning cycle. The DIGSP is benchmarked against a baseline multi-gene genetic programming (BGP) model using a dataset of steel fiber-reinforced concrete (SFRC) beams. Across 30 independent trials with 65% training, 10% validation, and 25% testing splits, DIGSP consistently outperformed BGP in training and test root mean squared error (RMSE). The Wilcoxon rank-sum test confirmed statistical significance (p < 0.01), and DIGSP showed tighter error distributions and fewer outliers. No significant difference was observed in validation RMSE due to limited sample size. These results demonstrate that domain-informed structural decomposition and symbolic abstraction improve convergence and generalization. DIGSP offers a principled and interpretable modeling strategy for systems where symbolic superposition aligns with the underlying physical structure.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2025.

Builds on

8 of 29 references.

References · 8

  1. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 608
  2. 2024Numerical analysis of physics-informed neural networks and related models in physics-informed machine learningcited by 39
  3. 2023Genetic Programming Based Symbolic Regression for Analytical Solutions to Differential Equationscited by 6
  4. 2024Benchmarking symbolic regression constant optimization schemescited by 6
  5. 2025Embedding Domain-Specific Knowledge from LLMs into the Feature Engineering Pipelinecited by 3
  6. 2022A Novel Ontology-guided Attribute Partitioning Ensemble Learning Model for Early Prediction of Cognitive Deficits using Quantitative Structural MRI in Very Preterm Infantscited by 2
  7. 2024Semantic-Preserving Feature Partitioning for Multi-View Ensemble Learningcited by 2
  8. 2025From Embeddings to Equations: Genetic-Programming Surrogates for Interpretable Transformer Classificationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Large Language Model Agent as a Mechanical Designer
  2. 2025A Large Language Model-Empowered Agent for Reliable and Robust Structural Analysis
  3. 2024Reinforced Symbolic Learning with Logical Constraints for Predicting Turbine Blade Fatigue Life
  4. 2026Structure-aware Reinforcement Learning for Protein Directed Evolution
  5. 2026Language Models Refine Mechanical Linkage Designs Through Symbolic Reflection and Modular Optimisation
  6. 2025EvoSpeak: Large Language Models for Interpretable Genetic Programming-Evolved Heuristics
  7. 2026GAE: Graph-Augmented Evolution for Scientific Discovery via Reinforcement Optimization
  8. 2025Iterated Agent for Symbolic Regression