Expanding Reasoning Potential in Foundation Model by Learning Diverse Chains of Thought Patterns
On the map: LLM reasoning → Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent progress in large reasoning models for challenging mathematical reasoning has been driven by reinforcement learning (RL). Incorporating long chain-of-thought (CoT) data during mid-training has also been shown to substantially improve reasoning depth. However, current approaches often utilize CoT data indiscriminately, leaving open the critical question of which data types most effectively enhance model reasoning capabilities. In this paper, we define the foundation model's reasoning potential for the first time as the inverse of the number of independent attempts required to correctly answer the question, which is strongly correlated with the final model performance. We then propose utilizing diverse data enriched with high-value reasoning patterns to expand the reasoning potential. Specifically, we abstract atomic reasoning patterns from CoT sequences, characterized by commonality and inductive capabilities, and use them to construct a core reference set enriched with valuable reasoning patterns. Furthermore, we propose a dual-granularity algorithm involving chains of reasoning patterns and token entropy, efficiently selecting high-value CoT data (CoTP) from the data pool that aligns with the core set, thereby training models to master reasoning effectively. Only 10B-token CoTP data enables the 85A6B Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model to improve by 9.58% on the challenging AIME 2024 and 2025, and to raise the upper bound of downstream RL performance by 7.81%.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompting and chain-of-thought reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 32 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.
Builds on
32 of 44 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 31
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,320
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
- 2025DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learningcited by 6,330
- 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
- 2018Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 4,886
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,823
- 2025Understanding R1-Zero-Like Training: A Critical Perspectivecited by 1,345
- 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?cited by 982
19 more
- 2019DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphscited by 903
- 2025Group Sequence Policy Optimizationcited by 835
- 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 708
- 2025Beyond the 80/20 Rule: High-Entropy Minority Tokens Drive Effective Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoningcited by 559
- 2025The Entropy Mechanism of Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning Language Modelscited by 485
- 2025GLM-4.5: Agentic, Reasoning, and Coding (ARC) Foundation Modelscited by 467
- 2023CMMLU: Measuring massive multitask language understanding in Chinesecited by 449
- 2025Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRscited by 377
- 2025MathArena: Evaluating LLMs on Uncontaminated Math Competitionscited by 297
- 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMscited by 289
- 2024OpenMathInstruct-2: Accelerating AI for Math with Massive Open-Source Instruction Datacited by 200
- 2025Echo Chamber: RL Post-training Amplifies Behaviors Learned in Pretrainingcited by 129
- 2025OctoThinker: Mid-training Incentivizes Reinforcement Learning Scalingcited by 113
- 2025MegaMath: Pushing the Limits of Open Math Corporacited by 51
- 20251.4 Million Open-Source Distilled Reasoning Dataset to Empower Large Language Model Trainingcited by 49
- 2024JiuZhang3.0: Efficiently Improving Mathematical Reasoning by Training Small Data Synthesis Modelscited by 45
- 2025Rethinking Reflection in Pre-Trainingcited by 43
- 2025Large-Scale Diverse Synthesis for Mid-Trainingcited by 3
- 2025LinkQA: Synthesizing Diverse QA from Multiple Seeds Strongly Linked by Knowledge Pointscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2026LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 Technical Reportcited by 34
- 2025A Survey on LLM Mid-Trainingcited by 21
- 2026LongCat-Flash-Thinking-2601 Technical Report23 Jan 2026
- 2025A Survey on LLM Mid-Training27 Oct 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025From Reasoning to Super-Intelligence: A Search-Theoretic Perspective
- 2025Marco-o1 v2: Towards Widening The Distillation Bottleneck for Reasoning Models
- 2026MI-Distillation: Selecting from Model-Interpolated Instruct-Reasoning Data Spectrum for Chain-of-Thought Distillation
- 2025Deconstructing Long Chain-of-Thought: A Structured Reasoning Optimization Framework for Long CoT Distillation
- 2025Mind the Gap: Bridging Thought Leap for Improved Chain-of-Thought Tuning
- 2025Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models
- 2025NPG-Muse: Scaling Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning with NP-Hard Graph Problems
- 2025Why Does Reasoning Length Converge? Unveiling the Underfitting-Overfitting Trade-off in Chain-of-Thought