mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Framework for Rapidly Developing and Deploying Protection Against Large Language Model Attacks

arXiv 2509.20639 ↗First posted 25 Sep 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revolutionized AI deployment, enabling autonomous and semi-autonomous applications across industries through intuitive language interfaces and continuous improvements in model development. However, the attendant increase in autonomy and expansion of access permissions among AI applications also make these systems compelling targets for malicious attacks. Their inherent susceptibility to security flaws necessitates robust defenses, yet no known approaches can prevent zero-day or novel attacks against LLMs. This places AI protection systems in a category similar to established malware protection systems: rather than providing guaranteed immunity, they minimize risk through enhanced observability, multi-layered defense, and rapid threat response, supported by a threat intelligence function designed specifically for AI-related threats. Prior work on LLM protection has largely evaluated individual detection models rather than end-to-end systems designed for continuous, rapid adaptation to a changing threat landscape. We present a production-grade defense system rooted in established malware detection and threat intelligence practices. Our platform integrates three components: a threat intelligence system that turns emerging threats into protections; a data platform that aggregates and enriches information while providing observability, monitoring, and ML operations; and a release platform enabling safe, rapid detection updates without disrupting customer workflows. Together, these components deliver layered protection against evolving LLM threats while generating training data for continuous model improvement and deploying updates without interrupting production.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Sep 2025.

Builds on

15 of 44 references.

References · 15

  1. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
  2. 2023Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Modelscited by 651
  3. 2023Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defensescited by 364
  4. 2025Defeating Prompt Injections by Designcited by 297
  5. 2023Certifying LLM Safety against Adversarial Promptingcited by 266
  6. 2024Attention Tracker: Detecting Prompt Injection Attacks in LLMscited by 95
  7. 2023Identifying and Mitigating Vulnerabilities in LLM-Integrated Applicationscited by 54
  8. 2025PromptShield: Deployable Detection for Prompt Injection Attackscited by 50
  9. 2025Bypassing LLM Guardrails: An Empirical Analysis of Evasion Attacks against Prompt Injection and Jailbreak Detection Systemscited by 26
  10. 2025Lessons From Red Teaming 100 Generative AI Productscited by 23
  11. 2024Rapid Response: Mitigating LLM Jailbreaks with a Few Examplescited by 16
  12. 2020Adversarial Machine Learning: Bayesian Perspectivescited by 8
3 more
  1. 2020Wisdom of the Ensemble: Improving Consistency of Deep Learning Modelscited by 7
  2. 2023Unraveling the Key Components of OOD Generalization via Diversificationcited by 4
  3. 2025Enhancing Security in LLM Applications: A Performance Evaluation of Early Detection Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.