mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Latent Activation Editing: Inference-Time Refinement of Learned Policies for Safer Multirobot Navigation

arXiv 2509.20623 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2025cs.ROcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning has enabled significant progress in complex domains such as coordinating and navigating multiple quadrotors. However, even well-trained policies remain vulnerable to collisions in obstacle-rich environments. Addressing these infrequent but critical safety failures through retraining or fine-tuning is costly and risks degrading previously learned skills. Inspired by activation steering in large language models and latent editing in computer vision, we introduce a framework for inference-time Latent Activation Editing (LAE) that refines the behavior of pre-trained policies without modifying their weights or architecture. The framework operates in two stages: (i) an online classifier monitors intermediate activations to detect states associated with undesired behaviors, and (ii) an activation editing module that selectively modifies flagged activations to shift the policy towards safer regimes. In this work, we focus on improving safety in multi-quadrotor navigation. We hypothesize that amplifying a policy's internal perception of risk can induce safer behaviors. We instantiate this idea through a latent collision world model trained to predict future pre-collision activations, thereby prompting earlier and more cautious avoidance responses. Extensive simulations and real-world Crazyflie experiments demonstrate that LAE achieves statistically significant reduction in collisions (nearly 90% fewer cumulative collisions compared to the unedited baseline) and substantially increases the fraction of collision-free trajectories, while preserving task completion. More broadly, our results establish LAE as a lightweight paradigm, feasible on resource-constrained hardware, for post-deployment refinement of learned robot policies.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Anticipatory Risk-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Safe Flight Through Dynamic Clutter
  2. 2026LaST-R1: Reinforcing Robotic Manipulation via Adaptive Physical Latent Reasoning
  3. 2026Dynamics Are Learned, Not Told: Semi-Supervised Discovery of Latent Dynamics Geometries For Zero-Shot Policy Adaptation
  4. 2026Successful but Unsafe: An Analytical Benchmark for Revealing Collisions in Vision-and-Language Navigation ↗
  5. 2026Predicting Consequences and Reinforcing Navigation Policies with Latent World Models
  6. 2022Latent Plans for Task-Agnostic Offline Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2024Bootstrapping Reinforcement Learning with Imitation for Vision-Based Agile Flight
  8. 2025RISE: Robust Imitation through Stochastic Encoding