mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adaptive Event-Triggered Policy Gradient for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2509.20338 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2025eess.SY cs.AI cs.MAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Conventional multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) methods rely on time-triggered execution, where agents sample and communicate actions at fixed intervals. This approach is often computationally expensive and communication-intensive. To address this limitation, we propose ET-MAPG (Event-Triggered Multi-Agent Policy Gradient reinforcement learning), a framework that jointly learns an agent's control policy and its event-triggering policy. Unlike prior work that decouples these mechanisms, ET-MAPG integrates them into a unified learning process, enabling agents to learn not only what action to take but also when to execute it. For scenarios with inter-agent communication, we introduce AET-MAPG, an attention-based variant that leverages a self-attention mechanism to learn selective communication patterns. AET-MAPG empowers agents to determine not only when to trigger an action but also with whom to communicate and what information to exchange, thereby optimizing coordination. Both methods can be integrated with any policy gradient MARL algorithm. Extensive experiments across diverse MARL benchmarks demonstrate that our approaches achieve performance comparable to state-of-the-art, time-triggered baselines while significantly reducing both computational load and communication overhead.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2025.

Builds on

14 of 31 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  3. 2021The Surprising Effectiveness of PPO in Cooperative, Multi-Agent Gamescited by 942
  4. 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 575
  5. 2020Is Independent Learning All You Need in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge?cited by 294
  6. 2017Emergence of Grounded Compositional Language in Multi-Agent Populationscited by 263
  7. 2021How to Train Your Robot with Deep Reinforcement Learning; Lessons We've Learnedcited by 213
  8. 2020Benchmarking Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Cooperative Taskscited by 212
  9. 2019Learning to Schedule Communication in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 93
  10. 2016Learning to Communicate to Solve Riddles with Deep Distributed Recurrent Q-Networkscited by 21
  11. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning for Event-Triggered Controlcited by 16
  12. 2022Model-Based and Data-Driven Control of Event- and Self-Triggered Discrete-Time LTI Systemscited by 2
2 more
  1. 2022Data-driven Self-triggered Control via Trajectory Predictioncited by 2
  2. 2024Adaptive Event-triggered Reinforcement Learning Control for Complex Nonlinear Systemscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Ensembling Prioritized Hybrid Policies for Multi-agent Pathfinding
  2. 2024XP-MARL: Auxiliary Prioritization in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning to Address Non-Stationarity ↗
  3. 2024Attention-Driven Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: Enhancing Decisions with Expertise-Informed Tasks
  4. 2026G2MAF: Test-Time Gradient Guidance for Multi-Agent Flow Policies
  5. 2024Tacit Learning with Adaptive Information Selection for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2026Policy Gradient Methods for Non-Markovian Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2026Priority-Driven Control and Communication in Decentralized Multi-Agent Systems via Reinforcement Learning
  8. 2025TIGER-MARL: Enhancing Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Temporal Information through Graph-based Embeddings and Representations