mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Feature Dynamics as Implicit Data Augmentation: A Depth-Decomposed View on Deep Neural Network Generalization

arXiv 2509.20334 ↗First posted 24 Sep 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Why do deep networks generalize well? In contrast to classical generalization theory, we approach this fundamental question by examining not only inputs and outputs, but the evolution of internal features. Our study suggests a phenomenon of temporal consistency that predictions remain stable when shallow features from earlier checkpoints combine with deeper features from later ones. This stability is not a trivial convergence artifact. It acts as a form of implicit, structured augmentation that supports generalization. We show that temporal consistency extends to unseen and corrupted data, but collapses when semantic structure is destroyed (e.g., random labels). Statistical tests further reveal that SGD injects anisotropic noise aligned with a few principal directions, reinforcing its role as a source of structured variability. Together, these findings suggest a conceptual perspective that links feature dynamics to generalization, pointing toward future work on practical surrogates for measuring temporal feature evolution.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Sep 2025.

Builds on

20 of 24 references.

References · 20

  1. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  2. 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
  3. 2016Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalizationcited by 1,674
  4. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
  5. 2020Prevalence of Neural Collapse during the terminal phase of deep learning trainingcited by 719
  6. 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 686
  7. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 552
  8. 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 342
  9. 2017A PAC-Bayesian Approach to Spectrally-Normalized Margin Bounds for Neural Networkscited by 314
  10. 2019Uniform convergence may be unable to explain generalization in deep learningcited by 224
  11. 2021Assessing Generalization of SGD via Disagreementcited by 117
  12. 2017Stochastic gradient descent performs variational inference, converges to limit cycles for deep networkscited by 109
8 more
  1. 2017Towards Understanding Generalization of Deep Learning: Perspective of Loss Landscapescited by 84
  2. 2023The Implicit Regularization of Dynamical Stability in Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 44
  3. 2020Distributional Generalization: A New Kind of Generalizationcited by 42
  4. 2023Revisiting Data Augmentation for Rotational Invariance in Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 16
  5. 2024Transformer Block Coupling and its Correlation with Generalization in LLMscited by 10
  6. 2021Deep Residual Networks Learn the Geodesic Curve in the Wasserstein Spacecited by 8
  7. 2022Revisiting the acceleration phenomenon via high-resolution differential equationscited by 5
  8. 2023Learning Trajectories are Generalization Indicatorscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.