mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DeepACTIF: Efficient Feature Attribution via Activation Traces in Neural Sequence Models

arXiv 2509.19362 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Feature attribution is essential for interpreting deep learning models, particularly in time-series domains such as healthcare, biometrics, and human-AI interaction. However, standard attribution methods, such as Integrated Gradients or SHAP, are computationally intensive and not well-suited for real-time applications. We present DeepACTIF, a lightweight and architecture-aware feature attribution method that leverages internal activations of sequence models to estimate feature importance efficiently. Focusing on LSTM-based networks, we introduce an inverse-weighted aggregation scheme that emphasises stability and magnitude of activations across time steps. Our evaluation across three biometric gaze datasets shows that DeepACTIF not only preserves predictive performance under severe feature reduction (top 10% of features) but also significantly outperforms established methods, including SHAP, IG, and DeepLIFT, in terms of both accuracy and statistical robustness. Using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and effect size analysis, we demonstrate that DeepACTIF yields more informative feature rankings with significantly lower error across all top-k conditions (10 - 40%). Our experiments demonstrate that DeepACTIF not only reduces computation time and memory usage by orders of magnitude but also preserves model accuracy when using only top-ranked features. That makes DeepACTIF a viable solution for real-time interpretability on edge devices such as mobile XR headsets or embedded health monitors.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2025.

Builds on

9 of 15 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  3. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  4. 2019A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Towards Medical XAIcited by 404
  5. 2019Ablation Studies in Artificial Neural Networkscited by 60
  6. 2022Evaluation of post-hoc interpretability methods in time-series classificationcited by 53
  7. 2019Gaze-in-wild: A dataset for studying eye and head coordination in everyday activitiescited by 25
  8. 2023Interpretation of Time-Series Deep Models: A Surveycited by 15
  9. 2022Comparing Baseline Shapley and Integrated Gradients for Local Explanation: Some Additional Insightscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.