mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Graph-Radiomic Learning (GrRAiL) Descriptor to Characterize Imaging Heterogeneity in Confounding Tumor Pathologies

arXiv 2509.19258 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2025cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A significant challenge in solid tumors is reliably distinguishing confounding pathologies from malignant neoplasms on routine imaging. While radiomics methods seek surrogate markers of lesion heterogeneity on CT/MRI, many aggregate features across the region of interest (ROI) and miss complex spatial relationships among varying intensity compositions. We present a new Graph-Radiomic Learning (GrRAiL) descriptor for characterizing intralesional heterogeneity (ILH) on clinical MRI scans. GrRAiL (1) identifies clusters of sub-regions using per-voxel radiomic measurements, then (2) computes graph-theoretic metrics to quantify spatial associations among clusters. The resulting weighted graphs encode higher-order spatial relationships within the ROI, aiming to reliably capture ILH and disambiguate confounding pathologies from malignancy. To assess efficacy and clinical feasibility, GrRAiL was evaluated in n=947 subjects spanning three use cases: differentiating tumor recurrence from radiation effects in glioblastoma (GBM; n=106) and brain metastasis (n=233), and stratifying pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) into no+low vs high risk (n=608). In a multi-institutional setting, GrRAiL consistently outperformed state-of-the-art baselines - Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), textural radiomics, and intensity-graph analysis. In GBM, cross-validation (CV) and test accuracies for recurrence vs pseudo-progression were 89% and 78% with >10% test-accuracy gains over comparators. In brain metastasis, CV and test accuracies for recurrence vs radiation necrosis were 84% and 74% (>13% improvement). For IPMN risk stratification, CV and test accuracies were 84% and 75%, showing >10% improvement.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2025.

Builds on

9 of 62 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  4. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  5. 2018Representation Learning on Graphs with Jumping Knowledge Networkscited by 877
  6. 2020DeepEMD: Differentiable Earth Mover's Distance for Few-Shot Learningcited by 49
  7. 2018Lung and Pancreatic Tumor Characterization in the Deep Learning Era: Novel Supervised and Unsupervised Learning Approachescited by 14
  8. 2019INN: Inflated Neural Networks for IPMN Diagnosiscited by 9
  9. 2021Radiomic Deformation and Textural Heterogeneity (R-DepTH) Descriptor to characterize Tumor Field Effect: Application to Survival Prediction in Glioblastomacited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.