Implementation of airborne ML models with semantics preservation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine Learning (ML) may offer new capabilities in airborne systems. However, as any piece of airborne systems, ML-based systems will be required to guarantee their safe operation. Thus, their development will have to be demonstrated to be compliant with the adequate guidance. So far, the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has published a concept paper and an EUROCAE/SAE group is preparing ED-324. Both approaches delineate high-level objectives to confirm the ML model achieves its intended function and maintains training performance in the target environment. The paper aims to clarify the difference between an ML model and its corresponding unambiguous description, referred to as the Machine Learning Model Description (MLMD). It then refines the essential notion of semantics preservation to ensure the accurate replication of the model. We apply our contributions to several industrial use cases to build and compare several target models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2025.
Builds on
4 of 33 references.
References · 4
- 2024Robustness Assessment of a Runway Object Classifier for Safe Aircraft Taxiingcited by 8
- 2023Data-centric Operational Design Domain Characterization for Machine Learning-based Aeronautical Productscited by 4
- 2023Formal description of ML models for unambiguous implementationcited by 2
- 2024Efficient and Mathematically Robust Operations for Certified Neural Networks Inferencecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.