Graph Enhanced Trajectory Anomaly Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Trajectory anomaly detection is essential for identifying unusual and unexpected movement patterns in applications ranging from intelligent transportation systems to urban safety and fraud prevention. Existing methods only consider limited aspects of the trajectory nature and its movement space by treating trajectories as sequences of sampled locations, with sampling determined by positioning technology, e.g., GPS, or by high-level abstractions such as staypoints. Trajectories are analyzed in Euclidean space, neglecting the constraints and connectivity information of the underlying movement network, e.g., road or transit networks. The proposed Graph Enhanced Trajectory Anomaly Detection (GETAD) framework tightly integrates road network topology, segment semantics, and historical travel patterns to model trajectory data. GETAD uses a Graph Attention Network to learn road-aware embeddings that capture both physical attributes and transition behavior, and augments these with graph-based positional encodings that reflect the spatial layout of the road network. A Transformer-based decoder models sequential movement, while a multiobjective loss function combining autoregressive prediction and supervised link prediction ensures realistic and structurally coherent representations. To improve the robustness of anomaly detection, we introduce Confidence Weighted Negative Log Likelihood (CW NLL), an anomaly scoring function that emphasizes high-confidence deviations. Experiments on real-world and synthetic datasets demonstrate that GETAD achieves consistent improvements over existing methods, particularly in detecting subtle anomalies in road-constrained environments. These results highlight the benefits of incorporating graph structure and contextual semantics into trajectory modeling, enabling more precise and context-aware anomaly detection.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2025.
Builds on
17 of 44 references.
References · 17
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2018Self-Attention with Relative Position Representationscited by 1,120
- 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,070
- 2018Link Prediction Based on Graph Neural Networkscited by 832
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 776
- 2018Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problemcited by 323
- 2016LSTM-based Encoder-Decoder for Multi-sensor Anomaly Detectioncited by 215
- 2020Graph-Bert: Only Attention is Needed for Learning Graph Representationscited by 177
5 more
- 2022Self-supervised Trajectory Representation Learning with Temporal Regularities and Travel Semanticscited by 58
- 2018Sequential Variational Autoencoders for Collaborative Filteringcited by 31
- 2016Semi-supervised Graph Embedding Approach to Dynamic Link Predictioncited by 9
- 2024Trajectory Anomaly Detection with Language Modelscited by 6
- 2024CausalTAD: Causal Implicit Generative Model for Debiased Online Trajectory Anomaly Detectioncited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.