LAD-VF: LLM-Automatic Differentiation Enables Fine-Tuning-Free Robot Planning from Formal Methods Feedback
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) can translate natural language instructions into executable action plans for robotics, autonomous driving, and other domains. Yet, deploying LLM-driven planning in the physical world demands strict adherence to safety and regulatory constraints, which current models often violate due to hallucination or weak alignment. Traditional data-driven alignment methods, such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), require costly human labeling, while recent formal-feedback approaches still depend on resource-intensive fine-tuning. In this paper, we propose LAD-VF, a fine-tuning-free framework that leverages formal verification feedback for automated prompt engineering. By introducing a formal-verification-informed text loss integrated with LLM-AutoDiff, LAD-VF iteratively refines prompts rather than model parameters. This yields three key benefits: (i) scalable adaptation without fine-tuning; (ii) compatibility with modular LLM architectures; and (iii) interpretable refinement via auditable prompts. Experiments in robot navigation and manipulation tasks demonstrate that LAD-VF substantially enhances specification compliance, improving success rates from 60% to over 90%. Our method thus presents a scalable and interpretable pathway toward trustworthy, formally-verified LLM-driven control systems.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Sep 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026VASO: Formally Verifiable Self-Evolving Skills for Physical AI Agentscited by 3
- 2026Safe Embodied AI for Long-horizon Tasks: A Cross-layer Analysis of Robotic Manipulationcited by 1
- 2026HPFA: Hypergraph-Based Paired Failure Attribution for LLM Reasoningcited by 1
- 2026Security and Privacy in Large-Model-Driven Embodied Agents: Attacks, Defenses, and Future Directionscited by 0
- 2026Security and Privacy in Large-Model-Driven Embodied Agents: Attacks, Defenses, and Future Directions19 Aug 2026
- 2026HPFA: Hypergraph-Based Paired Failure Attribution for LLM Reasoning3 Aug 2026
- 2026Safe Embodied AI for Long-horizon Tasks: A Cross-layer Analysis of Robotic Manipulation4 Jun 2026
- 2026VASO: Formally Verifiable Self-Evolving Skills for Physical AI Agents3 Jun 2026