Modeling Bottom-up Information Quality during Language Processing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Contemporary theories model language processing as integrating both top-down expectations and bottom-up inputs. One major prediction of such models is that the quality of the bottom-up inputs modulates ease of processing -- noisy inputs should lead to difficult and effortful comprehension. We test this prediction in the domain of reading. First, we propose an information-theoretic operationalization for the "quality" of bottom-up information as the mutual information (MI) between visual information and word identity. We formalize this prediction in a mathematical model of reading as a Bayesian update. Second, we test our operationalization by comparing participants' reading times in conditions where words' information quality has been reduced, either by occluding their top or bottom half, with full words. We collect data in English and Chinese. We then use multimodal language models to estimate the mutual information between visual inputs and words. We use these data to estimate the specific effect of reduced information quality on reading times. Finally, we compare how information is distributed across visual forms. In English and Chinese, the upper half contains more information about word identity than the lower half. However, the asymmetry is more pronounced in English, a pattern which is reflected in the reading times.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2025.
Builds on
10 of 37 references.
References · 10
- 2024Qwen2-VL: Enhancing Vision-Language Model's Perception of the World at Any Resolutioncited by 4,234
- 2020Information-Theoretic Probing for Linguistic Structurecited by 207
- 2022On the Effect of Anticipation on Reading Timescited by 19
- 2020STARC: Structured Annotations for Reading Comprehensioncited by 17
- 2023Quantifying the redundancy between prosody and textcited by 12
- 2025Texture or Semantics? Vision-Language Models Get Lost in Font Recognitioncited by 11
- 2021Disambiguatory Signals are Stronger in Word-initial Positionscited by 9
- 2024An information-theoretic model of shallow and deep language comprehensioncited by 6
- 2025The time scale of redundancy between prosody and linguistic contextcited by 4
- 2025Using Information Theory to Characterize Prosodic Typology: The Case of Tone, Pitch-Accent and Stress-Accentcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Temperature-scaling surprisal estimates improve fit to human reading times -- but does it do so for the "right reasons"?
- 2025Large Language Models Are Human-Like Internally
- 2026Rethinking Contextualization by Reinterpreting Attention Head Channels
- 2026Dual Alignment Between Language Model Layers and Human Sentence Processing
- 2022Language models and brains align due to more than next-word prediction and word-level information
- 2024Fine-Grained Prediction of Reading Comprehension from Eye Movements
- 2026Internal Knowledge Without External Expression: Probing the Generalization Boundary of a Classical Chinese Language Model
- 2025The in-context inductive biases of vision-language models differ across modalities