mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Interpretable Audio Editing Evaluation via Chain-of-Thought Difference-Commonality Reasoning with Multimodal LLMs

arXiv 2509.16975 ↗First posted 21 Sep 2025cs.SD eess.AScited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic mean opinion score (MOS) prediction serves as a principled alternative to both subjective listening tests and objective metrics, providing scalable and consistent audio evaluation. Inspired by the LLM-as-Judge paradigm, recent multimodal large language models offer strong perceptual modeling and reasoning capabilities, enabling audio quality assessment. In this work, we address the challenging problem of audio editing evaluation and propose the first natural language-based automated evaluation framework built upon Qwen2-Audio. Two caption-based fine-tuning tasks are introduced to enhance multi-audio understanding, together with a designed Chain-of-Thought prompting strategy to encourage structured, step-by-step reasoning. Experiments show that our framework produces interpretable and logically consistent text-based evaluations, aligning closely with human judgments while outperforming existing baselines. The code and demo are available at https://github.com/NKU-HLT/Eval_Reasoning.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.