mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Describe-to-Score: A text-guided framework for image complexity assessment

arXiv 2509.16609 ↗First posted 20 Sep 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurately assessing image complexity (IC) is essential for many vision tasks, yet existing approaches rely almost exclusively on visual features and therefore fail to capture the high-level semantics that humans often use when judging complexity. We introduce a multimodal perspective for IC modeling by integrating visual representations with caption-derived textual semantics. This integration enriches the representational space and provides complementary structural cues that are difficult to infer from vision alone. From an information theoretic and representation viewpoint, we offer an idealized analysis suggesting how semantic guidance can regularize the hypothesis space and support more stable generalization. We propose D2S (Describe-to-Score), a text-guided framework that uses caption-derived semantics only during training to regularize visual complexity modeling, while preserving a vision-only inference pipeline with no additional multimodal overhead at inference. Concretely, D2S transfers semantic structure into the visual branch through feature alignment and entropy distribution alignment, encouraging the visual encoder to internalize complexity-relevant semantic regularities. Experiments show that D2S achieves state-of-the-art performance on the IC9600 benchmark and remains competitive on no-reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA) tasks. Additional analyses further clarify the sample-imbalance issue in the small samples training setting and the distribution-shift limitations observed in cross-dataset transfer. Code is available at: https://github.com/xauat-liushipeng/D2S.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Sep 2025.

Builds on

20 of 53 references.

References · 20

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  5. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  6. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  7. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  8. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
  9. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  10. 2023TOPIQ: A Top-down Approach from Semantics to Distortions for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 226
  11. 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 223
  12. 2023Convolutions Die Hard: Open-Vocabulary Segmentation with Single Frozen Convolutional CLIPcited by 201
8 more
  1. 2023ARNIQA: Learning Distortion Manifold for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 89
  2. 2024Natural Language Understanding and Inference with MLLM in Visual Question Answering: A Surveycited by 76
  3. 2023Cross-Modal Retrieval: A Systematic Review of Methods and Future Directionscited by 40
  4. 2025CLICv2: Image Complexity Representation via Content Invariance Contrastive Learningcited by 4
  5. 2025Content-Distortion High-Order Interaction for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 2
  6. 2025DGIQA: Depth-guided Feature Attention and Refinement for Generalizable Image Quality Assessmentcited by 2
  7. 2025Segmenting and Understanding: Region-aware Semantic Attention for Fine-grained Image Quality Assessment with Large Language Modelscited by 2
  8. 2024Attention Down-Sampling Transformer, Relative Ranking and Self-Consistency for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.