mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Prostate Capsule Segmentation from Micro-Ultrasound Images using Adaptive Focal Loss

arXiv 2509.15595 ↗First posted 19 Sep 2025eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Micro-ultrasound (micro-US) is a promising imaging technique for cancer detection and computer-assisted visualization. This study investigates prostate capsule segmentation using deep learning techniques from micro-US images, addressing the challenges posed by the ambiguous boundaries of the prostate capsule. Existing methods often struggle in such cases, motivating the development of a tailored approach. This study introduces an adaptive focal loss function that dynamically emphasizes both hard and easy regions, taking into account their respective difficulty levels and annotation variability. The proposed methodology has two primary strategies: integrating a standard focal loss function as a baseline to design an adaptive focal loss function for proper prostate capsule segmentation. The focal loss baseline provides a robust foundation, incorporating class balancing and focusing on examples that are difficult to classify. The adaptive focal loss offers additional flexibility, addressing the fuzzy region of the prostate capsule and annotation variability by dilating the hard regions identified through discrepancies between expert and non-expert annotations. The proposed method dynamically adjusts the segmentation model's weights better to identify the fuzzy regions of the prostate capsule. The proposed adaptive focal loss function demonstrates superior performance, achieving a mean dice coefficient (DSC) of 0.940 and a mean Hausdorff distance (HD) of 1.949 mm in the testing dataset. These results highlight the effectiveness of integrating advanced loss functions and adaptive techniques into deep learning models. This enhances the accuracy of prostate capsule segmentation in micro-US images, offering the potential to improve clinical decision-making in prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment planning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Sep 2025.

Builds on

11 of 35 references.

References · 11

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,352
  4. 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 834
  5. 2015Holistically-Nested Edge Detectioncited by 592
  6. 2016Efficient Multi-Scale 3D CNN with Fully Connected CRF for Accurate Brain Lesion Segmentationcited by 263
  7. 2018Boundary loss for highly unbalanced segmentationcited by 190
  8. 2019Reducing the Hausdorff Distance in Medical Image Segmentation with Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 116
  9. 2020Optimization for Medical Image Segmentation: Theory and Practice when evaluating with Dice Score or Jaccard Indexcited by 52
  10. 2023MicroSegNet: A Deep Learning Approach for Prostate Segmentation on Micro-Ultrasound Imagescited by 25
  11. 2019Boundary-weighted Domain Adaptive Neural Network for Prostate MR Image Segmentationcited by 22

Built on by

Not cited yet.