mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sentinel Agents for Secure and Trustworthy Agentic AI in Multi-Agent Systems

arXiv 2509.14956 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2025cs.AI cs.MAcited by 8

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper proposes a novel architectural framework aimed at enhancing security and reliability in multi-agent systems (MAS). A central component of this framework is a network of Sentinel Agents, functioning as a distributed security layer that integrates techniques such as semantic analysis via large language models (LLMs), behavioral analytics, retrieval-augmented verification, and cross-agent anomaly detection. Such agents can potentially oversee inter-agent communications, identify potential threats, enforce privacy and access controls, and maintain comprehensive audit records. Complementary to the idea of Sentinel Agents is the use of a Coordinator Agent. The Coordinator Agent supervises policy implementation, and manages agent participation. In addition, the Coordinator also ingests alerts from Sentinel Agents. Based on these alerts, it can adapt policies, isolate or quarantine misbehaving agents, and contain threats to maintain the integrity of the MAS ecosystem. This dual-layered security approach, combining the continuous monitoring of Sentinel Agents with the governance functions of Coordinator Agents, supports dynamic and adaptive defense mechanisms against a range of threats, including prompt injection, collusive agent behavior, hallucinations generated by LLMs, privacy breaches, and coordinated multi-agent attacks. In addition to the architectural design, we present a simulation study where 162 synthetic attacks of different families (prompt injection, hallucination, and data exfiltration) were injected into a multi-agent conversational environment. The Sentinel Agents successfully detected the attack attempts, confirming the practical feasibility of the proposed monitoring approach. The framework also offers enhanced system observability, supports regulatory compliance, and enables policy evolution over time.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 6 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2025.

Builds on

6 of 24 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025From Prompt Injections to Protocol Exploits: Threats in LLM-Powered AI Agents Workflows29 Jun

Other references · 5

  1. 2025Prompt Injection Detection and Mitigation via AI Multi-Agent NLP Frameworkscited by 15
  2. 2024AI Multi-Agent Interoperability Extension for Managing Multiparty Conversationscited by 6
  3. 2025Multi-Trigger Poisoning Amplifies Backdoor Vulnerabilities in LLMscited by 4
  4. 2024Conversational AI Multi-Agent Interoperability, Universal Open APIs for Agentic Natural Language Multimodal Communicationscited by 3
  5. 2025Modeling Response Consistency in Multi-Agent LLM Systems: A Comparative Analysis of Shared and Separate Context Approachescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Security Considerations for Multi-agent Systems
  2. 2025SentinelAgent: Graph-based Anomaly Detection in Multi-Agent Systems
  3. 2026SoK: When Safe Agents Fail Together: The Security of Multi Agent LLM Systems
  4. 2025Toward a Safe Internet of Agents
  5. 2025SentinelNet: Safeguarding Multi-Agent Collaboration Through Credit-Based Dynamic Threat Detection
  6. 2025Extending the OWASP Multi-Agentic System Threat Modeling Guide: Insights from Multi-Agent Security Research
  7. 2026Beyond Single-Agent Alignment: Preventing Context-Fragmented Violations in Multi-Agent Systems
  8. 2026LLM-Based Agents for Software and Systems Security: Approaches, Applications, and Assessment