mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Data coarse graining can improve model performance

arXiv 2509.14498 ↗First posted 18 Sep 2025cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.dis-nn cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Lossy data transformations by definition lose information. Yet, in modern machine learning, methods like data pruning and lossy data augmentation can help improve generalization performance. We study this paradox using a solvable model of high-dimensional, ridge-regularized linear regression under 'data coarse graining.' Inspired by the renormalization group in statistical physics, we analyze coarse-graining schemes that systematically discard features based on their relevance to the learning task. Our results reveal a nonmonotonic dependence of the prediction risk on the degree of coarse graining. A 'high-pass' scheme--which filters out less relevant, lower-signal features--can help models generalize better. By contrast, a 'low-pass' scheme that integrates out more relevant, higher-signal features is purely detrimental. Crucially, using optimal regularization, we demonstrate that this nonmonotonicity is a distinct effect of data coarse graining and not an artifact of double descent. Our framework offers a clear, analytical explanation for why careful data augmentation works: it strips away less relevant degrees of freedom and isolates more predictive signals. Our results highlight a complex, nonmonotonic risk landscape shaped by the structure of the data, and illustrate how ideas from statistical physics provide a principled lens for understanding modern machine learning phenomena.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Sep 2025.

Builds on

19 of 31 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
  2. 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 930
  3. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 927
  4. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 672
  5. 2019On Variational Bounds of Mutual Informationcited by 559
  6. 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 528
  7. 2019Surprises in High-Dimensional Ridgeless Least Squares Interpolationcited by 513
  8. 2020Noise or Signal: The Role of Image Backgrounds in Object Recognitioncited by 343
  9. 2019On Mutual Information Maximization for Representation Learningcited by 316
  10. 2020A Theory of Usable Information Under Computational Constraintscited by 162
  11. 2015High-Dimensional Asymptotics of Prediction: Ridge Regression and Classificationcited by 148
  12. 2020Optimal Regularization Can Mitigate Double Descentcited by 109
7 more
  1. 2020On the Optimal Weighted ℓ2 Regularization in Overparameterized Linear Regressioncited by 98
  2. 2020Asymptotics of Ridge (less) Regression under General Source Conditioncited by 62
  3. 2020Learning Optimal Representations with the Decodable Information Bottleneckcited by 33
  4. 2022Information bottleneck theory of high-dimensional regression: relevancy, efficiency and optimalitycited by 9
  5. 2016PCA meets RGcited by 8
  6. 2018Coarse--graining, fixed points, and scaling in a large population of neuronscited by 4
  7. 2021Quasi-universal scaling in mouse-brain neuronal activity stems from edge-of-instability critical dynamicscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.