Correct-Detect: Balancing Performance and Ambiguity Through the Lens of Coreference Resolution in LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) are intended to reflect human linguistic competencies. But humans have access to a broad and embodied context, which is key in detecting and resolving linguistic ambiguities, even in isolated text spans. A foundational case of semantic ambiguity is found in the task of coreference resolution: how is a pronoun related to an earlier person mention? This capability is implicit in nearly every downstream task, and the presence of ambiguity at this level can alter performance significantly. We show that LLMs can achieve good performance with minimal prompting in both coreference disambiguation and the detection of ambiguity in coreference, however, they cannot do both at the same time. We present the CORRECT-DETECT trade-off: though models have both capabilities and deploy them implicitly, successful performance balancing these two abilities remains elusive.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2025.
Builds on
18 of 39 references.
References · 18
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 320
- 2023We're Afraid Language Models Aren't Modeling Ambiguitycited by 126
- 2023Clarify When Necessary: Resolving Ambiguity Through Interaction with LMscited by 98
- 2024Aligning Language Models to Explicitly Handle Ambiguitycited by 56
- 2024The broader spectrum of in-context learningcited by 35
- 2023Do large language models resemble humans in language use?cited by 34
- 2023A Survey on Asking Clarification Questions Datasets in Conversational Systemscited by 28
- 2023Are Large Language Models Temporally Grounded?cited by 27
- 2020Discourse structure interacts with reference but not syntax in neural language modelscited by 17
- 2024Bridging Context Gaps: Leveraging Coreference Resolution for Long Contextual Understandingcited by 16
- 2024How to Make the Most of LLMs' Grammatical Knowledge for Acceptability Judgmentscited by 14
6 more
- 2023AmbiCoref: Evaluating Human and Model Sensitivity to Ambiguous Coreferencecited by 12
- 2023"One-Size-Fits-All"? Examining Expectations around What Constitute "Fair" or "Good" NLG System Behaviorscited by 11
- 2024AmbigNLG: Addressing Task Ambiguity in Instruction for NLGcited by 10
- 2023The Open-domain Paradox for Chatbots: Common Ground as the Basis for Human-like Dialoguecited by 4
- 2024Unveiling Divergent Inductive Biases of LLMs on Temporal Datacited by 4
- 2025Who Relies More on World Knowledge and Bias for Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution: Humans or LLMs?cited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.