mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Multi-Agent LLM Defense Pipeline Against Prompt Injection Attacks

arXiv 2509.14285 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2025cs.CR cs.LGcited by 11

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Prompt injection attacks represent a major vulnerability in Large Language Model (LLM) deployments, where malicious instructions embedded in user inputs can override system prompts and induce unintended behaviors. This paper presents a novel multi-agent defense framework that employs specialized LLM agents in coordinated pipelines to detect and neutralize prompt injection attacks in real-time. We evaluate our approach using two distinct architectures: a sequential chain-of-agents pipeline and a hierarchical coordinator-based system. Our comprehensive evaluation on 55 unique prompt injection attacks, grouped into 8 categories and totaling 400 attack instances across two LLM platforms (ChatGLM and Llama2), demonstrates significant security improvements. Without defense mechanisms, baseline Attack Success Rates (ASR) reached 30% for ChatGLM and 20% for Llama2. Our multi-agent pipeline achieved 100% mitigation, reducing ASR to 0% across all tested scenarios. The framework demonstrates robustness across multiple attack categories including direct overrides, code execution attempts, data exfiltration, and obfuscation techniques, while maintaining system functionality for legitimate queries.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2025.

Builds on

20 of 37 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
  4. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  5. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  6. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
  7. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,443
  8. 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 722
  9. 2023Prompt Injection attack against LLM-integrated Applicationscited by 605
  10. 2023SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attackscited by 469
  11. 2024Great, Now Write an Article About That: The Crescendo Multi-Turn LLM Jailbreak Attackcited by 390
  12. 2023Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and Defensescited by 364
8 more
  1. 2023Multi-step Jailbreaking Privacy Attacks on ChatGPTcited by 333
  2. 2023Are aligned neural networks adversarially aligned?cited by 315
  3. 2023Certifying LLM Safety against Adversarial Promptingcited by 266
  4. 2024On Prompt-Driven Safeguarding for Large Language Modelscited by 116
  5. 2024SelfDefend: LLMs Can Defend Themselves against Jailbreaking in a Practical Mannercited by 63
  6. 2023Self-Guard: Empower the LLM to Safeguard Itselfcited by 54
  7. 2023AttentionViz: A Global View of Transformer Attentioncited by 50
  8. 2024A Novel Evaluation Framework for Assessing Resilience Against Prompt Injection Attacks in Large Language Modelscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 11.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Prompt Infection: LLM-to-LLM Prompt Injection within Multi-Agent Systems
  2. 2026CAITLYN: Can LLM Agents Autonomously Synthesize Defenses against Emerging Injection Attacks?
  3. 2026Toward Secure LLM Agents: Threat Surfaces, Attacks, Defenses, and Evaluation
  4. 2026The Landscape of Prompt Injection Threats in LLM Agents: From Taxonomy to Analysis
  5. 2025From Prompt Injections to Protocol Exploits: Threats in LLM-Powered AI Agents Workflows
  6. 2026Universal Defenses for Tool-Integrated LLM Agents Against Adversarial Attacks
  7. 2025The Dark Side of LLMs: Agent-based Attack Vectors for System-level Compromise
  8. 2025AgentVigil: Generic Black-Box Red-teaming for Indirect Prompt Injection against LLM Agents