Latent Traits and Cross-Task Transfer: Deconstructing Dataset Interactions in LLM Fine-tuning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models are increasingly deployed across diverse applications. This often includes tasks LLMs have not encountered during training. This implies that enumerating and obtaining the high-quality training data for all tasks is infeasible. Thus, we often need to rely on transfer learning using datasets with different characteristics, and anticipate out-of-distribution requests. Motivated by this practical need, we propose an analysis framework, building a transfer learning matrix and dimensionality reduction, to dissect these cross-task interactions. We train and analyze 10 models to identify latent abilities (e.g., Reasoning, Sentiment Classification, NLU, Arithmetic) and discover the side effects of the transfer learning. Our findings reveal that performance improvements often defy explanations based on surface-level dataset similarity or source data quality. Instead, hidden statistical factors of the source dataset, such as class distribution and generation length proclivities, alongside specific linguistic features, are actually more influential. This work offers insights into the complex dynamics of transfer learning, paving the way for more predictable and effective LLM adaptation.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Sep 2025.
Builds on
23 of 29 references.
References · 23
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 10,109
- 2023Efficient Memory Management for Large Language Model Serving with PagedAttentioncited by 5,944
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,434
- 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,245
- 2019PAWS: Paraphrase Adversaries from Word Scramblingcited by 402
- 2024LoRA Learns Less and Forgets Lesscited by 328
- 2025OpenThoughts: Data Recipes for Reasoning Modelscited by 304
- 2024Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Language Model Performancecited by 130
- 2020Exploring and Predicting Transferability across NLP Taskscited by 128
11 more
- 2022Same Author or Just Same Topic? Towards Content-Independent Style Representationscited by 86
- 2023Goat: Fine-tuned LLaMA Outperforms GPT-4 on Arithmetic Taskscited by 84
- 2024A Closer Look at the Limitations of Instruction Tuningcited by 77
- 2023Do Models Really Learn to Follow Instructions? An Empirical Study of Instruction Tuningcited by 49
- 2024Unveiling the Impact of Coding Data Instruction Fine-Tuning on Large Language Models Reasoningcited by 31
- 2024Scalable Multitask Learning Using Gradient-based Estimation of Task Affinitycited by 20
- 2021Rethinking Why Intermediate-Task Fine-Tuning Workscited by 18
- 2022Exploring the Role of Task Transferability in Large-Scale Multi-Task Learningcited by 17
- 2022When to Use Multi-Task Learning vs Intermediate Fine-Tuning for Pre-Trained Encoder Transfer Learningcited by 17
- 2021Evaluating the Values of Sources in Transfer Learningcited by 11
- 2024Identifying Task Groupings for Multi-Task Learning Using Pointwise V-Usable Informationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.