mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Correlation between Individual Fairness and Predictive Accuracy in Probabilistic Models

arXiv 2509.13165 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We investigate individual fairness in generative probabilistic classifiers by analysing the robustness of posterior inferences to perturbations in private features. Building on established results in robustness analysis, we hypothesise a correlation between robustness and predictive accuracy, specifically, instances exhibiting greater robustness are more likely to be classified accurately. We empirically assess this hypothesis using a benchmark of fourteen datasets with fairness concerns, employing Bayesian networks as the underlying generative models. To address the computational complexity associated with robustness analysis over multiple private features with Bayesian networks, we reformulate the problem as a most probable explanation task in an auxiliary Markov random field. Our experiments confirm the hypothesis about the correlation, suggesting novel directions to mitigate the traditional trade-off between fairness and accuracy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2025.

Builds on

5 of 17 references.

References · 5

  1. 2021A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learningcited by 157
  2. 2020To be Robust or to be Fair: Towards Fairness in Adversarial Trainingcited by 137
  3. 2021Emergent Unfairness in Algorithmic Fairness-Accuracy Trade-Off Researchcited by 34
  4. 2021Fairness Through Regularization for Learning to Rankcited by 8
  5. 2020Tractable Inference in Credal Sentential Decision Diagramscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.