mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PBPK-iPINNs: Inverse Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Brain Models

arXiv 2509.12666 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2025stat.ML cs.LG cs.NAcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) integrate machine learning with differential equations to solve forward and inverse problems while ensuring that predictions adhere to physical laws. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling advances beyond classical compartmental approaches by employing a mechanistic, physiology-focused framework. Such models involve many unknown parameters that are difficult to measure directly in humans due to ethical and practical constraints. PBPK models are constructed as systems of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and these parametric ODEs are often stiff, and traditional numerical and statistical methods frequently fail to converge. In this study, we consider a permeability-limited, four-compartment PBPK brain model that mimics human brain functionality in drug delivery. We introduce PBPK-iPINN, a method for estimating drug-specific or patient-specific parameters and drug concentration profiles using inverse PINNs. We also conducted parameter identifiability analysis to determines whether the parameters can be uniquely and reliably estimated from the available data. We demonstrate that, for the inverse problem to converge to the correct solution, the components of the loss function (data loss, initial condition loss, and residual loss) must be appropriately weighted, and the hyperparameters including the number of layers and neurons, activation functions, learning rate, optimizer, and collocation points must be carefully tuned. The performance of the PBPK-iPINN approach is then compared with established numerical and statistical methods. Accurate parameter estimation yields precise drug concentration-time profiles, which in turn enable the calculation of pharmacokinetic metrics. These metrics support drug developers and clinicians in designing and optimizing therapies for brain cancer.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2025.

Builds on

5 of 38 references.

References · 5

  1. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 855
  2. 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 619
  3. 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 335
  4. 2023Learning Specialized Activation Functions for Physics-informed Neural Networkscited by 14
  5. 2023Maximum-likelihood Estimators in Physics-Informed Neural Networks for High-dimensional Inverse Problemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.