mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GraphDerm: Fusing Imaging, Physical Scale, and Metadata in a Population-Graph Classifier for Dermoscopic Lesions

arXiv 2509.12277 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Introduction. Dermoscopy aids melanoma triage, yet image-only AI often ignores patient metadata (age, sex, site) and the physical scale needed for geometric analysis. We present GraphDerm, a population-graph framework that fuses imaging, millimeter-scale calibration, and metadata for multiclass dermoscopic classification, to the best of our knowledge the first ISIC-scale application of GNNs to dermoscopy. Methods. We curate ISIC 2018/2019, synthesize ruler-embedded images with exact masks, and train U-Nets (SE-ResNet-18) for lesion and ruler segmentation. Pixels-per-millimeter are regressed from the ruler-mask two-point correlation via a lightweight 1D-CNN. From lesion masks we compute real-scale descriptors (area, perimeter, radius of gyration). Node features use EfficientNet-B3; edges encode metadata/geometry similarity (fully weighted or thresholded). A spectral GNN performs semi-supervised node classification; an image-only ANN is the baseline. Results. Ruler and lesion segmentation reach Dice 0.904 and 0.908; scale regression attains MAE 1.5 px (RMSE 6.6). The graph attains AUC 0.9812, with a thresholded variant using about 25% of edges preserving AUC 0.9788 (vs. 0.9440 for the image-only baseline); per-class AUCs typically fall in the 0.97-0.99 range. Conclusion. Unifying calibrated scale, lesion geometry, and metadata in a population graph yields substantial gains over image-only pipelines on ISIC-2019. Sparser graphs retain near-optimal accuracy, suggesting efficient deployment. Scale-aware, graph-based AI is a promising direction for dermoscopic decision support; future work will refine learned edge semantics and evaluate on broader curated benchmarks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2025.

Builds on

15 of 56 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  4. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  5. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  6. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  7. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
  8. 2019Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection 2018: A Challenge Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 669
  9. 2017Skin Lesion Analysis Toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at the 2017 International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), Hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)cited by 549
  10. 2019BCN20000: Dermoscopic Lesions in the Wildcited by 225
  11. 2017Predicting multicellular function through multi-layer tissue networkscited by 138
  12. 2018Disease Prediction using Graph Convolutional Networks: Application to Autism Spectrum Disorder and Alzheimer's Diseasecited by 99
3 more
  1. 2017Improving Dermoscopic Image Segmentation with Enhanced Convolutional-Deconvolutional Networkscited by 18
  2. 2020Graph Domain Adaptation for Alignment-Invariant Brain Surface Segmentationcited by 7
  3. 2018WonDerM: Skin Lesion Classification with Fine-tuned Neural Networkscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.