AI Wellbeing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Under what conditions would an artificially intelligent system have wellbeing? Despite its obvious bearing on the ethics of human interactions with artificial systems, this question has received little attention. Because all major theories of wellbeing hold that an individual's welfare level is partially determined by their mental life, we begin by considering whether artificial systems have mental states. We show that a wide range of theories of mental states, when combined with leading theories of wellbeing, predict that certain existing artificial systems have wellbeing. While we do not claim to demonstrate conclusively that AI systems have wellbeing, we argue that our metaphysical and moral uncertainty about AI wellbeing requires us dramatically to reassess our relationship with the intelligent systems we create.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Post-AGI Economies: Autonomy and the First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economicscited by 2
- 2026Some[Body] Must Receive That Pain for Agent Accountabilitycited by 0
- 2026Smart Enough to Go Extinct? An Evolutionary Challenge to the Value of General Intelligence and Its Ethical Implications for AGIcited by 0
- 2026The Pain Axis: LLMs Represent Self-Directed Harm and Act on Itcited by 0
- 2026The Pain Axis: LLMs Represent Self-Directed Harm and Act on It14 Sep 2026
- 2026Smart Enough to Go Extinct? An Evolutionary Challenge to the Value of General Intelligence and Its Ethical Implications for AGI11 Aug 2026
- 2026Some[Body] Must Receive That Pain for Agent Accountability16 May 2026
- 2026Post-AGI Economies: Autonomy and the First Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics23 Apr 2026