Pseudo-D: Informing Multi-View Uncertainty Estimation with Calibrated Neural Training Dynamics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Computer-aided diagnosis systems must make critical decisions from medical images that are often noisy, ambiguous, or conflicting, yet today's models are trained on overly simplistic labels that ignore diagnostic uncertainty. One-hot labels erase inter-rater variability and force models to make overconfident predictions, especially when faced with incomplete or artifact-laden inputs. We address this gap by introducing a novel framework that brings uncertainty back into the label space. Our method leverages neural network training dynamics (NNTD) to assess the inherent difficulty of each training sample. By aggregating and calibrating model predictions during training, we generate uncertainty-aware pseudo-labels that reflect the ambiguity encountered during learning. This label augmentation approach is architecture-agnostic and can be applied to any supervised learning pipeline to enhance uncertainty estimation and robustness. We validate our approach on a challenging echocardiography classification benchmark, demonstrating superior performance over specialized baselines in calibration, selective classification, and multi-view fusion.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Sep 2025.
Builds on
16 of 32 references.
References · 16
- 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,143
- 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 852
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
- 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 364
- 2020Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin Rankingcited by 261
- 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
- 2022Trusted Multi-View Classification with Dynamic Evidential Fusioncited by 168
- 2020Self-Adaptive Training: beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 126
- 2020Beyond Class-Conditional Assumption: A Primary Attempt to Combat Instance-Dependent Label Noisecited by 82
- 2023Provable Dynamic Fusion for Low-Quality Multimodal Datacited by 82
- 2022Towards Better Selective Classificationcited by 25
- 2014Majority Vote of Diverse Classifiers for Late Fusioncited by 23
4 more
- 2022Data-IQ: Characterizing subgroups with heterogeneous outcomes in tabular datacited by 22
- 2021A New Semi-supervised Learning Benchmark for Classifying View and Diagnosing Aortic Stenosis from Echocardiogramscited by 15
- 2024Semi-Supervised Multimodal Multi-Instance Learning for Aortic Stenosis Diagnosiscited by 4
- 2024Reliable Multi-View Learning with Conformal Prediction for Aortic Stenosis Classification in Echocardiographycited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.