mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SH-SAS: An Implicit Neural Representation for Complex Spherical-Harmonic Scattering Fields for 3D Synthetic Aperture Sonar

arXiv 2509.11087 ↗First posted 14 Sep 2025cs.GR cs.CV cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) reconstruction requires recovering both the spatial distribution of acoustic scatterers and their direction-dependent response. Time-domain backprojection is the most common 3D SAS reconstruction algorithm, but it does not model directionality and can suffer from sampling limitations, aliasing, and occlusion. Prior neural volumetric methods applied to synthetic aperture sonar treat each voxel as an isotropic scattering density, not modeling anisotropic returns. We introduce SH-SAS, an implicit neural representation that expresses the complex acoustic scattering field as a set of spherical harmonic (SH) coefficients. A multi-resolution hash encoder feeds a lightweight MLP that outputs complex SH coefficients up to a specified degree L. The zeroth-order coefficient acts as an isotropic scattering field, which also serves as the density term, while higher orders compactly capture directional scattering with minimal parameter overhead. Because the model predicts the complex amplitude for any transmit-receive baseline, training is performed directly from 1-D time-of-flight signals without the need to beamform intermediate images for supervision. Across synthetic and real SAS (both in-air and underwater) benchmarks, results show that SH-SAS performs better in terms of 3D reconstruction quality and geometric metrics than previous methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 52 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2025.

Builds on

19 of 52 references.

References · 19

  1. 2022Instant Neural Graphics Primitives with a Multiresolution Hash Encodingcited by 3,723
  2. 2021NeuS: Learning Neural Implicit Surfaces by Volume Rendering for Multi-view Reconstructioncited by 1,712
  3. 2021T"oRF: Time-of-Flight Radiance Fields for Dynamic Scene View Synthesiscited by 88
  4. 2021Non-line-of-Sight Imaging via Neural Transient Fieldscited by 41
  5. 2022Neural Implicit Surface Reconstruction using Imaging Sonarcited by 19
  6. 2024DART: Implicit Doppler Tomography for Radar Novel View Synthesiscited by 19
  7. 2023Transient Neural Radiance Fields for Lidar View Synthesis and 3D Reconstructioncited by 18
  8. 2024Radar Fields: Frequency-Space Neural Scene Representations for FMCW Radarcited by 18
  9. 2023Neural Volumetric Reconstruction for Coherent Synthetic Aperture Sonarcited by 16
  10. 2024Neural Implicit Surface Reconstruction of Freehand 3D Ultrasound Volume with Geometric Constraintscited by 15
  11. 2024AONeuS: A Neural Rendering Framework for Acoustic-Optical Sensor Fusioncited by 13
  12. 2024Bathymetric Surveying with Imaging Sonar Using Neural Volume Renderingcited by 6
7 more
  1. 2024Transientangelo: Few-Viewpoint Surface Reconstruction Using Single-Photon Lidarcited by 6
  2. 2025SpINR: Neural Volumetric Reconstruction for FMCW Radarscited by 5
  3. 2021GPU Acceleration for Synthetic Aperture Sonar Image Reconstructioncited by 4
  4. 2022SINR: Deconvolving Circular SAS Images Using Implicit Neural Representationscited by 4
  5. 2025Multi-view 3D surface reconstruction from SAR images by inverse renderingcited by 3
  6. 2022Approximate Extraction of Late-Time Returns via Morphological Component Analysiscited by 2
  7. 2024NeRF-enabled Analysis-Through-Synthesis for ISAR Imaging of Small Everyday Objects with Sparse and Noisy UWB Radar Datacited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.