Symbolic Feedforward Networks for Probabilistic Finite Automata: Exact Simulation and Learnability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a formal and constructive theory showing that probabilistic finite automata (PFAs) can be exactly simulated using symbolic feedforward neural networks. Our architecture represents state distributions as vectors and transitions as stochastic matrices, enabling probabilistic state propagation via matrix-vector products. This yields a parallel, interpretable, and differentiable simulation of PFA dynamics using soft updates-without recurrence. We formally characterize probabilistic subset construction, varepsilon-closure, and exact simulation via layered symbolic computation, and prove equivalence between PFAs and specific classes of neural networks. We further show that these symbolic simulators are not only expressive but learnable: trained with standard gradient descent-based optimization on labeled sequence data, they recover the exact behavior of ground-truth PFAs. This learnability, formalized in Proposition 5.1, is the crux of this work. Our results unify probabilistic automata theory with neural architectures under a rigorous algebraic framework, bridging the gap between symbolic computation and deep learning.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2025.
Builds on
22 of 36 references.
References · 22
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 644
- 2016Adaptive Computation Time for Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 506
- 2014In Search of the Real Inductive Bias: On the Role of Implicit Regularization in Deep Learningcited by 342
- 2019Theoretical Limitations of Self-Attention in Neural Sequence Modelscited by 288
- 2019Compositionality decomposed: how do neural networks generalise?cited by 265
- 2017Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretationcited by 196
- 2017End-to-End Differentiable Provingcited by 161
- 2019Neural-Symbolic Computing: An Effective Methodology for Principled Integration of Machine Learning and Reasoningcited by 151
- 2017Approximating Continuous Functions by ReLU Nets of Minimal Widthcited by 122
- 2017Abstract Syntax Networks for Code Generation and Semantic Parsingcited by 92
- 2017Extracting Automata from Recurrent Neural Networks Using Queries and Counterexamplescited by 66
10 more
- 2017Learning to Remember Rare Eventscited by 63
- 2024Training Neural Networks as Recognizers of Formal Languagescited by 24
- 2022Extracting Weighted Finite Automata from Recurrent Neural Networks for Natural Languagescited by 10
- 2019Representing Formal Languages: A Comparison Between Finite Automata and Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 9
- 2015Learning Halfspaces and Neural Networks with Random Initializationcited by 4
- 2025The Geometry of ReLU Networks through the ReLU Transition Graphcited by 4
- 2025A Combinatorial Theory of Dropout: Subnetworks, Graph Geometry, and Generalizationcited by 3
- 2025Neural Networks as Universal Finite-State Machines: A Constructive Deterministic Finite Automaton Theorycited by 3
- 2025A Constructive Framework for Nondeterministic Automata via Time-Shared, Depth-Unrolled Feedforward Networkscited by 2
- 2019Probabilistic Deterministic Finite Automata and Recurrent Networks, Revisitedcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.