mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Cross-Layer Attention Probing for Fine-Grained Hallucination Detection

arXiv 2509.09700 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the large-scale adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) in various applications, there is a growing reliability concern due to their tendency to generate inaccurate text, i.e. hallucinations. In this work, we propose Cross-Layer Attention Probing (CLAP), a novel activation probing technique for hallucination detection, which processes the LLM activations across the entire residual stream as a joint sequence. Our empirical evaluations using five LLMs and three tasks show that CLAP improves hallucination detection compared to baselines on both greedy decoded responses as well as responses sampled at higher temperatures, thus enabling fine-grained detection, i.e. the ability to disambiguate hallucinations and non-hallucinations among different sampled responses to a given prompt. This allows us to propose a detect-then-mitigate strategy using CLAP to reduce hallucinations and improve LLM reliability compared to direct mitigation approaches. Finally, we show that CLAP maintains high reliability even when applied out-of-distribution.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2025.

Builds on

22 of 27 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
  2. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
  3. 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 819
  4. 2023SelfCheckGPT: Zero-Resource Black-Box Hallucination Detection for Generative Large Language Modelscited by 810
  5. 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 767
  6. 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 743
  7. 2019Latent Retrieval for Weakly Supervised Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 695
  8. 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 659
  9. 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 532
  10. 2023OPERA: Alleviating Hallucination in Multi-Modal Large Language Models via Over-Trust Penalty and Retrospection-Allocationcited by 478
  11. 2023Trusting Your Evidence: Hallucinate Less with Context-aware Decodingcited by 327
  12. 2023Chain-of-Verification Reduces Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 324
10 more
  1. 2022Confident Adaptive Language Modelingcited by 310
  2. 2024Semantic Entropy Probes: Robust and Cheap Hallucination Detection in LLMscited by 259
  3. 2024Lookback Lens: Detecting and Mitigating Contextual Hallucinations in Large Language Models Using Only Attention Mapscited by 142
  4. 2023Self-contradictory Hallucinations of Large Language Models: Evaluation, Detection and Mitigationcited by 124
  5. 2024Do I Know This Entity? Knowledge Awareness and Hallucinations in Language Modelscited by 115
  6. 2024HaloScope: Harnessing Unlabeled LLM Generations for Hallucination Detectioncited by 99
  7. 2023Attention Satisfies: A Constraint-Satisfaction Lens on Factual Errors of Language Modelscited by 67
  8. 2023Do Androids Know They're Only Dreaming of Electric Sheep?cited by 67
  9. 2023Evaluating Open-QA Evaluationcited by 35
  10. 2025(Im)possibility of Automated Hallucination Detection in Large Language Modelscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.

4 papers.