The Role of Community Detection Methods in Performance Variations of Graph Mining Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In real-world scenarios, large graphs represent relationships among entities in complex systems. Mining these large graphs often containing millions of nodes and edges helps uncover structural patterns and meaningful insights. Dividing a large graph into smaller subgraphs facilitates complex system analysis by revealing local information. Community detection extracts clusters or communities of graphs based on statistical methods and machine learning models using various optimization techniques. Structure based community detection methods are more suitable for applying to graphs because they do not rely heavily on rich node or edge attribute information. The features derived from these communities can improve downstream graph mining tasks, such as link prediction and node classification. In real-world applications, we often lack ground truth community information. Additionally, there is neither a universally accepted gold standard for community detection nor a single method that is consistently optimal across diverse applications. In many cases, it is unclear how practitioners select community detection methods, and choices are often made without explicitly considering their potential impact on downstream tasks. In this study, we investigate whether the choice of community detection algorithm significantly influences the performance of downstream applications. We propose a framework capable of integrating various community detection methods to systematically evaluate their effects on downstream task outcomes. Our comparative analysis reveals that specific community detection algorithms yield superior results in certain applications, highlighting that method selection substantially affects performance.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2025.
Builds on
9 of 30 references.
References · 9
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,543
- 2018Link Prediction Based on Graph Neural Networkscited by 829
- 2020Adaptive Graph Encoder for Attributed Graph Embeddingcited by 88
- 2021A Comprehensive Survey on Community Detection with Deep Learningcited by 63
- 2022DGraph: A Large-Scale Financial Dataset for Graph Anomaly Detectioncited by 63
- 2018GEMSEC: Graph Embedding with Self Clusteringcited by 61
- 2021A Survey of Community Detection Approaches: From Statistical Modeling to Deep Learningcited by 55
- 2022Cross-Domain Graph Anomaly Detection via Anomaly-aware Contrastive Alignmentcited by 31
Built on by
Not cited yet.