mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Securing Private Federated Learning in a Malicious Setting: A Scalable TEE-Based Approach with Client Auditing

arXiv 2509.08709 ↗First posted 10 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.CRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In cross-device private federated learning, differentially private follow-the-regularized-leader (DP-FTRL) has emerged as a promising privacy-preserving method. However, existing approaches assume a semi-honest server and have not addressed the challenge of securely removing this assumption. This is due to its statefulness, which becomes particularly problematic in practical settings where clients can drop out or be corrupted. While trusted execution environments (TEEs) might seem like an obvious solution, a straightforward implementation can introduce forking attacks or availability issues due to state management. To address this problem, our paper introduces a novel server extension that acts as a trusted computing base (TCB) to realize maliciously secure DP-FTRL. The TCB is implemented with an ephemeral TEE module on the server side to produce verifiable proofs of server actions. Some clients, upon being selected, participate in auditing these proofs with small additional communication and computational demands. This extension solution reduces the size of the TCB while maintaining the system's scalability and liveness. We provide formal proofs based on interactive differential privacy, demonstrating privacy guarantee in malicious settings. Finally, we experimentally show that our framework adds small constant overhead to clients in several realistic settings.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2025.

Builds on

26 of 86 references.

References · 26

  1. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  2. 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
  3. 2021Federated Learning with Buffered Asynchronous Aggregationcited by 190
  4. 2021Practical and Private (Deep) Learning without Sampling or Shufflingcited by 170
  5. 2018Amplification by Shuffling: From Local to Central Differential Privacy via Anonymitycited by 164
  6. 2021The Distributed Discrete Gaussian Mechanism for Federated Learning with Secure Aggregationcited by 128
  7. 2021PPFL: Privacy-preserving Federated Learning with Trusted Execution Environmentscited by 93
  8. 2020Turbo-Aggregate: Breaking the Quadratic Aggregation Barrier in Secure Federated Learningcited by 78
  9. 2021Differentially Private Federated Learning on Heterogeneous Datacited by 74
  10. 2021The Skellam Mechanism for Differentially Private Federated Learningcited by 68
  11. 2023Federated Learning of Gboard Language Models with Differential Privacycited by 66
  12. 2022Improved Differential Privacy for SGD via Optimal Private Linear Operators on Adaptive Streamscited by 59
14 more
  1. 2022Multi-Epoch Matrix Factorization Mechanisms for Private Machine Learningcited by 48
  2. 2018Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Executioncited by 47
  3. 2017Prio: Private, Robust, and Scalable Computation of Aggregate Statisticscited by 36
  4. 2020Private Summation in the Multi-Message Shuffle Modelcited by 34
  5. 2023Correlated Noise Provably Beats Independent Noise for Differentially Private Learningcited by 23
  6. 2024Federated Learning in Practice: Reflections and Projectionscited by 15
  7. 2021Concurrent Composition of Differential Privacycited by 12
  8. 2024A Hassle-free Algorithm for Private Learning in Practice: Don't Use Tree Aggregation, Use BLTscited by 9
  9. 2022Concurrent Composition Theorems for Differential Privacycited by 8
  10. 2020Mitigating Leakage in Federated Learning with Trusted Hardwarecited by 6
  11. 2024Elephants Do Not Forget: Differential Privacy with State Continuity for Privacy Budgetcited by 5
  12. 2024The Forking Way: When TEEs Meet Consensuscited by 3
  13. 2022GlassDB: An Efficient Verifiable Ledger Database System Through Transparencycited by 2
  14. 2023Confidential Consortium Framework: Secure Multiparty Applications with Confidentiality, Integrity, and High Availabilitycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.