Predicting person-level injury severity using crash narratives: A balanced approach with roadway classification and natural language process techniques
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Predicting injuries and fatalities in traffic crashes plays a critical role in enhancing road safety, improving emergency response, and guiding public health interventions. This study investigates the added value of unstructured crash narratives (written by police officers at the scene) when combined with structured crash data to predict injury severity. Two widely used Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) and Word2Vec, were employed to extract semantic meaning from the narratives, and their effectiveness was compared. To address the challenge of class imbalance, a K-Nearest Neighbors-based oversampling method was applied to the training data prior to modeling. The dataset consists of crash records from Kentucky spanning 2019 to 2023. To account for roadway heterogeneity, three road classification schemes were used: (1) eight detailed functional classes (e.g., Urban Two-Lane, Rural Interstate, Urban Multilane Divided), (2) four broader paired categories (e.g., Urban vs. Rural, Freeway vs. Non-Freeway), and (3) a unified dataset without classification. A total of 102 machine learning models were developed by combining structured features and narrative-based features using the two NLP techniques alongside three ensemble algorithms: XGBoost, Random Forest, and AdaBoost. Results demonstrate that models incorporating narrative data consistently outperform those relying solely on structured data. Among all combinations, TF-IDF coupled with XGBoost yielded the most accurate predictions in most subgroups. The findings highlight the power of integrating textual and structured crash information to enhance person-level injury prediction. This work offers a practical and adaptable framework for transportation safety professionals to improve crash severity modeling, guide policy decisions, and design more effective countermeasures.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2025.
Builds on
4 of 34 references.
References · 4
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2021A Survey on Ensemble Learning under the Era of Deep Learningcited by 47
- 2024Learning Traffic Crashes as Language: Datasets, Benchmarks, and What-if Causal Analysescited by 10
- 2024Recent Advances in Traffic Accident Analysis and Prediction: A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning Techniquescited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.