Understanding Stigmatizing Language Lexicons: A Comparative Analysis in Clinical Contexts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Stigmatizing language results in healthcare inequities, yet there is no universally accepted or standardized lexicon defining which words, terms, or phrases constitute stigmatizing language in healthcare. We conducted a systematic search of the literature to identify existing stigmatizing language lexicons and then analyzed them comparatively to examine: 1) similarities and discrepancies between these lexicons, and 2) the distribution of positive, negative, or neutral terms based on an established sentiment dataset. Our search identified four lexicons. The analysis results revealed moderate semantic similarity among them, and that most stigmatizing terms are related to judgmental expressions by clinicians to describe perceived negative behaviors. Sentiment analysis showed a predominant proportion of negatively classified terms, though variations exist across lexicons. Our findings underscore the need for a standardized lexicon and highlight challenges in defining stigmatizing language in clinical texts.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Sep 2025.
Builds on
1 of 26 references.
References · 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.