Investigating Location-Regularised Self-Supervised Feature Learning for Seafloor Visual Imagery
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
High-throughput interpretation of robotically gathered seafloor visual imagery can increase the efficiency of marine monitoring and exploration. Although recent research has suggested that location metadata can enhance self-supervised feature learning (SSL), its benefits across different SSL strategies, models and seafloor image datasets are underexplored. This study evaluates the impact of location-based regularisation on six state-of-the-art SSL frameworks, which include Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Vision Transformer (ViT) models with varying latent-space dimensionality. Evaluation across three diverse seafloor image datasets finds that location-regularisation consistently improves downstream classification performance over standard SSL, with average F1-score gains of 4.9 ± 4.0% for CNNs and 6.3 ± 8.9% for ViTs, respectively. While CNNs pretrained on generic datasets benefit from high-dimensional latent representations, dataset-optimised SSL achieves similar performance across the high (512) and low (128) dimensional latent representations. Location-regularised SSL improves CNN performance over pre-trained models by 2.7 ± 2.7% and 10.1 ± 9.4% for high and low-dimensional latent representations, respectively. For ViTs, high-dimensionality benefits both pre-trained and dataset-optimised SSL. Although location-regularisation improves SSL performance compared to standard SSL methods, pre-trained ViTs show strong generalisation, matching the best-performing location-regularised SSL with F1-scores of 0.795 ± 0.075 and 0.795 ± 0.077, respectively. The findings highlight the value of location metadata for SSL regularisation, particularly when using low-dimensional latent representations, and demonstrate strong generalisation of high-dimensional ViTs for seafloor image analysis.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2025.
Builds on
20 of 30 references.
References · 20
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,968
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
- 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,028
- 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,013
8 more
- 2020Self-supervised Learning: Generative or Contrastivecited by 694
- 2020A Survey on Contrastive Self-supervised Learningcited by 554
- 2021Self-Supervised Learning with Data Augmentations Provably Isolates Content from Stylecited by 312
- 2023A Survey on Self-supervised Learning: Algorithms, Applications, and Future Trendscited by 207
- 2020Unsupervised Learning of Dense Visual Representationscited by 147
- 20203D CNN-PCA: A Deep-Learning-Based Parameterization for Complex Geomodelscited by 13
- 2023DenseDINO: Boosting Dense Self-Supervised Learning with Token-Based Point-Level Consistencycited by 6
- 2021GeoCLR: Georeference Contrastive Learning for Efficient Seafloor Image Interpretationcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.