Mapping Community Appeals Systems: Lessons for Community-led Moderation in Multi-Level Governance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Platforms are increasingly adopting industrial models of moderation that prioritize scalability and consistency, frequently at the expense of context-sensitive and user-centered values. Building on the multi-level governance framework that examines the interdependent relationship between platforms and middle-level communities, we investigate community appeals systems on Discord as a model for successful community-led governance. We investigate how Discord servers operationalize appeal systems through a qualitative interview study with focus groups and individual interviews with 17 community moderators. Our findings reveal a structured appeals process that balances scalability, fairness, and accountability while upholding community-centered values of growth and rehabilitation. Communities design these processes to empower users, ensuring their voices are heard in moderation decisions and fostering a sense of belonging. This research provides insights into the practical implementation of community-led governance in a multi-level governance framework, illustrating how communities can maintain their core principles while integrating procedural fairness and tool-based design. We discuss how platforms can gain insights from community-led moderation work to motivate governance structures that effectively balance and align the interests of multiple stakeholders.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Sep 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.