CC-GSEO-Bench: A Content-Centric Benchmark for Measuring Source Influence in Generative Search Engines
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative Search Engines (GSEs) synthesize conversational answers from multiple sources, weakening the long-standing link between search ranking and digital visibility. This shift raises a central question for content creators: How can we reliably quantify a source article's influence on a GSE's synthesized answer across diverse intents and follow-up questions? We introduce CC-GSEO-Bench, a content-centric benchmark that couples a large-scale dataset with a creator-centered evaluation framework. The dataset contains over 1,000 source articles and over 5,000 query-article pairs, organized in a one-to-many structure for article-level evaluation. We ground construction in realistic retrieval by combining seed queries from public QA datasets with limited synthesized augmentation and retaining only queries whose paired source reappears in a follow-up retrieval step. On top of this dataset, we operationalize influence along three core dimensions: Exposure, Faithful Credit, and Causal Impact, and two content-quality dimensions: Readability and Structure, and Trustworthiness and Safety. We aggregate query-level signals over each article's query cluster to summarize influence strength, coverage, and stability, and empirically characterize influence dynamics across representative content patterns.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2025.
Builds on
18 of 27 references.
References · 18
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2023Self-RAG: Learning to Retrieve, Generate, and Critique through Self-Reflectioncited by 1,839
- 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,605
- 2019ELI5: Long Form Question Answeringcited by 575
- 2023Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant Contextcited by 369
- 2023Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Enginescited by 303
- 2025Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey on Agentic RAGcited by 249
- 2024The Good and The Bad: Exploring Privacy Issues in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)cited by 159
- 2024Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Surveycited by 146
6 more
- 2024What Evidence Do Language Models Find Convincing?cited by 75
- 2024Adversarial Search Engine Optimization for Large Language Modelscited by 40
- 2024How Susceptible are LLMs to Influence in Prompts?cited by 33
- 2024Ranking Manipulation for Conversational Search Enginescited by 26
- 2024DebateQA: Evaluating Question Answering on Debatable Knowledgecited by 12
- 2025C-SEO Bench: Does Conversational SEO Work?cited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Mechanism Design for Generative Engines: From Exploitation toward Win-Win Outcomes11 Aug 2026
- 2026From Experience to Skill: Multi-Agent Generative Engine Optimization via Reusable Strategy Learning21 Apr 2026
- 2026Diagnosing and Repairing Citation Failures in Generative Engine Optimization10 Mar 2026