mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Comparative Evaluation of Hard and Soft Clustering for Precise Brain Tumor Segmentation in MR Imaging

arXiv 2509.05340 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2025cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Segmentation of brain tumors from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) remains a pivotal challenge in medical image analysis due to the heterogeneous nature of tumor morphology and intensity distributions. Accurate delineation of tumor boundaries is critical for clinical decision-making, radiotherapy planning, and longitudinal disease monitoring. In this study, we perform a comprehensive comparative analysis of two major clustering paradigms applied in MRI tumor segmentation: hard clustering, exemplified by the K-Means algorithm, and soft clustering, represented by Fuzzy C-Means (FCM). While K-Means assigns each pixel strictly to a single cluster, FCM introduces partial memberships, meaning each pixel can belong to multiple clusters with varying degrees of association. Experimental validation was performed using the BraTS2020 dataset, incorporating pre-processing through Gaussian filtering and Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Equalization (CLAHE). Evaluation metrics included the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and processing time, which collectively demonstrated that K-Means achieved superior speed with an average runtime of 0.3s per image, whereas FCM attained higher segmentation accuracy with an average DSC of 0.67 compared to 0.43 for K-Means, albeit at a higher computational cost (1.3s per image). These results highlight the inherent trade-off between computational efficiency and boundary precision.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2025.

Builds on

1 of 26 references.

References · 1

  1. 2014A Comparative study Between Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm and Hard Clustering Algorithmcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.