mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Comparative Evaluation of Traditional and Deep Learning Feature Matching Algorithms using Chandrayaan-2 Lunar Data

arXiv 2509.04775 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate image registration is critical for lunar exploration, enabling surface mapping, resource localization, and mission planning. Aligning data from diverse lunar sensors -- optical (e.g., Orbital High Resolution Camera, Narrow and Wide Angle Cameras), hyperspectral (Imaging Infrared Spectrometer), and radar (e.g., Dual-Frequency Synthetic Aperture Radar, Selene/Kaguya mission) -- is challenging due to differences in resolution, illumination, and sensor distortion. We evaluate five feature matching algorithms: SIFT, ASIFT, AKAZE, RIFT2, and SuperGlue (a deep learning-based matcher), using cross-modality image pairs from equatorial and polar regions. A preprocessing pipeline is proposed, including georeferencing, resolution alignment, intensity normalization, and enhancements like adaptive histogram equalization, principal component analysis, and shadow correction. SuperGlue consistently yields the lowest root mean square error and fastest runtimes. Classical methods such as SIFT and AKAZE perform well near the equator but degrade under polar lighting. The results highlight the importance of preprocessing and learning-based approaches for robust lunar image registration across diverse conditions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2025.

Builds on

4 of 22 references.

References · 4

  1. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
  2. 2023RIFT2: Speeding-up RIFT with A New Rotation-Invariance Techniquecited by 11
  3. 2024MoonMetaSync: Lunar Image Registration Analysiscited by 1
  4. 2025Feature Point Extraction for Extra-Affine Imagecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.