mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Natural Spectral Fusion: p-Exponent Cyclic Scheduling and Early Decision-Boundary Alignment in First-Order Optimization

arXiv 2509.04713 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Spectral behaviors have been widely discussed in machine learning, yet the optimizer's own spectral bias remains unclear. We argue that first-order optimizers exhibit an intrinsic frequency preference that significantly reshapes the optimization path. To address this, we propose Natural Spectral Fusion (NSF): reframing training as controllable spectral coverage and information fusion rather than merely scaling step sizes. NSF has two core principles: treating the optimizer as a spectral controller that dynamically balances low- and high-frequency information; and periodically reweighting frequency bands at negligible cost, without modifying the model, data, or training pipeline. We realize NSF via a p-exponent extension of the second-moment term, enabling both positive and negative exponents, and implement it through cyclic scheduling. Theory and experiments show that adaptive methods emphasize low frequencies, SGD is near-neutral, and negative exponents amplify high-frequency information. Cyclic scheduling broadens spectral coverage, improves cross-band fusion, and induces early decision-boundary alignment, where accuracy improves even while loss remains high. Across multiple benchmarks, with identical learning-rate strategies and fixed hyperparameters, p-exponent cyclic scheduling consistently reduces test error and demonstrates distinct convergence behavior; on some tasks, it matches baseline accuracy with only one-quarter of the training cost. Overall, NSF reveals the optimizer's role as an active spectral controller and provides a unified, controllable, and efficient framework for first-order optimization.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2025.

Builds on

11 of 15 references.

References · 11

  1. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  2. 2018On the Spectral Bias of Neural Networkscited by 1,321
  3. 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
  4. 2019Frequency Principle: Fourier Analysis Sheds Light on Deep Neural Networkscited by 360
  5. 2017The Marginal Value of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Machine Learningcited by 248
  6. 2015A Differential Equation for Modeling Nesterov's Accelerated Gradient Method: Theory and Insightscited by 203
  7. 2019Towards Understanding the Spectral Bias of Deep Learningcited by 173
  8. 2020Frequency Bias in Neural Networks for Input of Non-Uniform Densitycited by 140
  9. 2024Why Transformers Need Adam: A Hessian Perspectivecited by 123
  10. 2017Improving Generalization Performance by Switching from Adam to SGDcited by 121
  11. 2017YellowFin and the Art of Momentum Tuningcited by 16

Built on by

Not cited yet.