No Clustering, No Routing: How Transformers Actually Process Rare Tokens
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models struggle with rare token prediction, yet the mechanisms driving their specialization remain unclear. Prior work identified specialized ``plateau'' neurons for rare tokens following distinctive three-regime influence patterns citeliu2025emergent, but their functional organization is unknown. We investigate this through neuron influence analyses, graph-based clustering, and attention head ablations in GPT-2 XL and Pythia models. Our findings show that: (1) rare token processing requires additional plateau neurons beyond the power-law regime sufficient for common tokens, forming dual computational regimes; (2) plateau neurons are spatially distributed rather than forming modular clusters; and (3) attention mechanisms exhibit no preferential routing to specialists. These results demonstrate that rare token specialization arises through distributed, training-driven differentiation rather than architectural modularity, preserving context-sensitive flexibility while achieving adaptive capacity allocation.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2025.
Builds on
7 of 12 references.
References · 7
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,413
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,307
- 2022Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail Knowledgecited by 452
- 2023The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forgetcited by 343
- 2022Towards Tracing Factual Knowledge in Language Models Back to the Training Datacited by 21
- 2025Emergent Specialization: Rare Token Neurons in Language Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.