Bringing Closure to False Discovery Rate Control: A General Principle for Multiple Testing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We present a novel necessary and sufficient principle for multiple testing methods controlling an expected loss. This principle asserts that every such multiple testing method is a special case of a general closed testing procedure based on e-values. It generalizes the Closure Principle, known to underlie all methods controlling familywise error and tail probabilities of false discovery proportions, to a large class of error rates -- in particular to the false discovery rate (FDR). By writing existing methods as special cases of this procedure, we can achieve uniform improvements, as we demonstrate for the e-Benjamini-Hochberg and the Benjamini-Yekutieli procedures, and the self-consistent method of Su (2018). We also show that methods derived using our novel e-Closure Principle generally control their error rate not just for one rejected set, but simultaneously over many, allowing post hoc flexibility for the researcher. Moreover, because all multiple testing methods for the expected loss error metrics covered by our framework are derived from the same procedure, researchers may even choose the error metric post hoc. Under certain conditions, this flexibility even extends to post hoc choice of the nominal error rate.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.
- 2026Bentkus-type asymptotic e-values4 Jun 2026
- 2026Beyond Fixed False Discovery Rates: Post-Hoc Conformal Selection with E-Variables13 Apr 2026