Towards Fundamental Language Models: Does Linguistic Competence Scale with Model Size?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models offer impressive language capabilities but suffer from well-known limitations, including hallucinations, biases, privacy concerns, and high computational costs. These issues are largely driven by the combination of linguistic competence and factual memorization within a single monolithic model. This paper introduces and empirically supports the Fundamental Language Model (FLM) paradigm, which advocates for smaller, linguistically competent models that offload factual retrieval to external tools. We evaluate models ranging from 135M to 32B parameters across three dimensions: linguistic competence, external factual knowledge, and internal factual knowledge. Our findings reveal that while both linguistic competence and factual knowledge improve with scale, internal factual knowledge grows significantly faster, suggesting that model size is more closely tied to memorization than to core language ability. These results support a modular approach to language modeling, where compact, linguistically proficient models serve as the foundation for tool-augmented systems. The FLM paradigm offers a path toward more efficient, interpretable, and sustainable NLP solutions.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2025.
Builds on
22 of 40 references.
References · 22
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
- 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,955
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
- 2019BoolQ: Exploring the Surprising Difficulty of Natural Yes/No Questionscited by 2,183
- 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 992
- 2020A Primer in BERTology: What we know about how BERT workscited by 815
- 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
- 2023Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?cited by 523
- 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 449
10 more
- 2018WiC: the Word-in-Context Dataset for Evaluating Context-Sensitive Meaning Representationscited by 372
- 2025SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Modelcited by 335
- 2025ZebraLogic: On the Scaling Limits of LLMs for Logical Reasoningcited by 201
- 2018ReCoRD: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Commonsense Reading Comprehensioncited by 200
- 2024Findings of the Second BabyLM Challenge: Sample-Efficient Pretraining on Developmentally Plausible Corporacited by 48
- 2025When One LLM Drools, Multi-LLM Collaboration Rulescited by 28
- 2024How transformers learn structured data: insights from hierarchical filteringcited by 18
- 2024Language in Vivo vs. in Silico: Size Matters but Larger Language Models Still Do Not Comprehend Language on a Par with Humans Due to Impenetrable Semantic Referencecited by 15
- 2023Large GPT-like Models are Bad Babies: A Closer Look at the Relationship between Linguistic Competence and Psycholinguistic Measurescited by 11
- 2024Tracking linguistic information in transformer-based sentence embeddings through targeted sparsificationcited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.