mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automated Wildfire Damage Assessment from Multi view Ground level Imagery Via Vision Language Models

arXiv 2509.01895 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2025cs.CVcited by 4

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models

Abstract (arXiv)

The escalating intensity and frequency of wildfires demand innovative computational methods for rapid and accurate property damage assessment. Traditional methods are often time-consuming, while modern computer vision approaches typically require extensive labeled datasets, hindering immediate post-disaster deployment. This research introduces a novel, zero-shot framework leveraging pre-trained multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to classify damage from ground-level imagery. Using Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4o (GPT-4o) as the primary model with comparative validation against Qwen2.5-Vision-Language-32-Billion-Instruct (Qwen), the research evaluates two pipelines applied to the 2025 Eaton and Palisades fires in California. These pipelines include an end-to-end inference method (Pipeline A) and a decoupled workflow where visual cues drive text-based classification (Pipeline B). A primary contribution of this study is demonstrating the efficacy of MLLMs in synthesizing information from multiple perspectives. The findings show that while single-view assessments struggle to classify intermediate damage, a multi-view analysis yields dramatic improvements. To explore the impact of prompting methods, the research benchmarked a baseline zero-shot and heuristic approach against advance reasoning strategies (Structured-Chain-of-Thought and Self-Consistency). The results indicate that simple prompting methods achieve a comparable accuracy to the reasoning strategies.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 5 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2025.

Builds on

5 of 30 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Remote Sensing Vision-Language Foundation Models without Annotations via Ground Remote Alignment12 Dec

Other references · 4

  1. 2020Assessing Post-Disaster Damage from Satellite Imagery using Semi-Supervised Learning Techniquescited by 10
  2. 2024ELEV-VISION-SAM: Integrated Vision Language and Foundation Model for Automated Estimation of Building Lowest Floor Elevationcited by 9
  3. 2025Hyperlocal disaster damage assessment using bi-temporal street-view imagery and pre-trained vision modelscited by 8
  4. 2023ELEV-VISION: Automated Lowest Floor Elevation Estimation from Segmenting Street View Imagescited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026WildfireVLM: AI-powered Analysis for Early Wildfire Detection and Risk Assessment Using Satellite Imagery
  2. 2026DamageScope: Vision-Language Retrieval at Scale for Disaster Damage Assessment from Satellite Imagery
  3. 2026DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response
  4. 2025Effective Damage Data Generation by Fusing Imagery with Human Knowledge Using Vision-Language Models
  5. 2026Assessing the Benefits of Combining Advanced Deep Learning Techniques for Post-Disaster Building Damage Assessment from UAV Imagery
  6. 2026From Pixels to Semantics: A Multi-Stage AI Framework for Structural Damage Detection in Satellite Imagery
  7. 2025DisasterM3: A Remote Sensing Vision-Language Dataset for Disaster Damage Assessment and Response
  8. 2026SAFIRE: Safety-Critical Benchmark for Fine-grained Fire and Smoke Understanding in Multimodal LLMs