Fail2Progress: Learning from Real-World Robot Failures with Stein Variational Inference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Skill effect models for long-horizon manipulation tasks are prone to failures in conditions not covered by training data distributions. Therefore, enabling robots to reason about and learn from failures is necessary. We investigate the problem of efficiently generating a dataset targeted to observed failures. After fine-tuning a skill effect model on this dataset, we evaluate the extent to which the model can recover from failures and minimize future failures. We propose Fail2Progress, an approach that leverages Stein variational inference to generate multiple simulation environments in parallel, enabling efficient data sample generation similar to observed failures. Our method is capable of handling several challenging mobile manipulation tasks, including transporting multiple objects, organizing a constrained shelf, and tabletop organization. Through large-scale simulation and real-world experiments, we demonstrate that our approach excels at learning from failures across different numbers of objects. Furthermore, we show that Fail2Progress outperforms several baselines.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2025.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.
7 papers.
- 2025Diagnose, Correct, and Learn from Manipulation Failures via Visual Symbolscited by 14
- 2025Hierarchical DLO Routing with Reinforcement Learning and In-Context Vision-language Modelscited by 2
- 2026How to Utilize Failure Demo Data?: Effective Data Selection for Imitation Learning Using Distribution Differences in Attention Mechanismcited by 0
- 2026Grasp-Then-Plan with Failure Attribution: A Closed Two-Stage Framework for Precise and Generalizable Robotic Manipulationcited by 0
- 2026RoboVista: Evaluating Vision Language Models for Diverse Robot Applicationscited by 0
- 2026MAGMA-GEN: Validated Recovery Supervision from Ambiguous Failures via Counterfactual Re-Executioncited by 0
- 2026CARF: Contrastive Attraction-Repulsion of Failure-Guided Flow Matchingcited by 0
- 2026CARF: Contrastive Attraction-Repulsion of Failure-Guided Flow Matching18 Sep 2026
- 2026MAGMA-GEN: Validated Recovery Supervision from Ambiguous Failures via Counterfactual Re-Execution17 Sep 2026
- 2026RoboVista: Evaluating Vision Language Models for Diverse Robot Applications6 Jul 2026
- 2026Grasp-Then-Plan with Failure Attribution: A Closed Two-Stage Framework for Precise and Generalizable Robotic Manipulation2 Jun 2026
- 2026How to Utilize Failure Demo Data?: Effective Data Selection for Imitation Learning Using Distribution Differences in Attention Mechanism8 May 2026
- 2025Diagnose, Correct, and Learn from Manipulation Failures via Visual Symbols2 Dec 2025
- 2025Hierarchical DLO Routing with Reinforcement Learning and In-Context Vision-language Models22 Oct 2025