mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

BM-CL: Bias Mitigation through the lens of Continual Learning

arXiv 2509.01730 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2025cs.LG cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Biases in machine learning pose significant challenges, particularly when models amplify disparities that affect disadvantaged groups. Traditional bias mitigation techniques often lead to a itshape leveling-down effect, whereby improving outcomes of disadvantaged groups comes at the expense of reduced performance for advantaged groups. This study introduces Bias Mitigation through Continual Learning (BM-CL), a novel framework that leverages the principles of continual learning to address this trade-off. We postulate that mitigating bias is conceptually similar to domain-incremental continual learning, where the model must adjust to changing fairness conditions, improving outcomes for disadvantaged groups without forgetting the knowledge that benefits advantaged groups. Drawing inspiration from techniques such as Learning without Forgetting and Elastic Weight Consolidation, we reinterpret bias mitigation as a continual learning problem. This perspective allows models to incrementally balance fairness objectives, enhancing outcomes for disadvantaged groups while preserving performance for advantaged groups. Experiments on synthetic and real-world image datasets, characterized by diverse sources of bias, demonstrate that the proposed framework mitigates biases while minimizing the loss of original knowledge. Our approach bridges the fields of fairness and continual learning, offering a promising pathway for developing machine learning systems that are both equitable and effective.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2025.

Builds on

25 of 43 references.

References · 25

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  4. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,787
  5. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  6. 2016Learning without Forgettingcited by 2,496
  7. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  8. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  9. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  10. 2019CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparisoncited by 1,423
  11. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,247
  12. 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Applicationcited by 872
13 more
  1. 2019Three scenarios for continual learningcited by 614
  2. 2021Just Train Twice: Improving Group Robustness without Training Group Informationcited by 523
  3. 2021Simple data balancing achieves competitive worst-group-accuracycited by 178
  4. 2022On Feature Learning in the Presence of Spurious Correlationscited by 145
  5. 2020Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AIcited by 81
  6. 2022MEDFAIR: Benchmarking Fairness for Medical Imagingcited by 68
  7. 2022Leveling Down in Computer Vision: Pareto Inefficiencies in Fair Deep Classifierscited by 53
  8. 2024The Clever Hans Mirage: A Comprehensive Survey on Spurious Correlations in Machine Learningcited by 41
  9. 2023The Unfairness of Fair Machine Learning: Levelling down and strict egalitarianism by defaultcited by 36
  10. 2021Domain-Incremental Continual Learning for Mitigating Bias in Facial Expression and Action Unit Recognitioncited by 19
  11. 2024BiasPruner: Debiased Continual Learning for Medical Image Classificationcited by 12
  12. 2024Open Challenges on Fairness of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging Applicationscited by 2
  13. 2024Positive-Sum Fairness: Leveraging Demographic Attributes to Achieve Fair AI Outcomes Without Sacrificing Group Gainscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.