mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards Agentic OS: An LLM Agent Framework for Linux Schedulers

arXiv 2509.01245 ↗First posted 1 Sep 2025cs.AI cs.MA cs.OScited by 2

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Operating system schedulers suffer from a fundamental semantic gap, where kernel policies fail to understand application-specific needs, leading to suboptimal performance. We introduce SchedCP, the first framework that enables fully autonomous Large Language Model (LLM) agents to safely and efficiently optimize Linux schedulers without human involvement. Our core insight is that the challenge is not merely to apply a better LLM, but to architect a decoupled control plane that separates the AI's role of semantic reasoning ("what to optimize") from the system's role of execution ("how to observe and act"), thereby separating the optimization problem into two stages: goal-inference and policy-synthesis. Implemented as Model Context Protocol(MCP) server, SchedCP provides a stable interface with three key services: a Workload Analysis Engine, an evolving Scheduler Policy Repository, and an Execution Verifier that validates all AI-generated code and configure before deployment with static and dynamic analysis. We demonstrate this architecture's power with sched-agent, a multi-agent system that autonomously analyzes workloads, synthesizes custom eBPF scheduling policies, and deploys them via the schedext infrastructure. Our evaluation shows that SchedCP achieves up to an 1.79x performance improvement, and a 13x cost reduction compared to naive agentic approaches, all while maintaining high success rate. By bridging the semantic gap, SchedCP democratizes expert-level system optimization and represents a step towards creating truly self-optimizing, application-aware operating systems. The code is open-sourced in https://github.com/eunomia-bpf/schedcp

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2025.

Builds on

9 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025Code Researcher: Deep Research Agent for Large Systems Code and Commit History27 May
  2. 2024SOEN-101: Code Generation by Emulating Software Process Models Using Large Language Model Agents23 Mar
  3. 2023ChatDev: Communicative Agents for Software Development16 Jul

Other references · 6

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,761
  3. 2018Learning Scheduling Algorithms for Data Processing Clusterscited by 133
  4. 2019Neo: A Learned Query Optimizercited by 80
  5. 2020FIRM: An Intelligent Fine-Grained Resource Management Framework for SLO-Oriented Microservicescited by 41
  6. 2025A Survey of In-Context Reinforcement Learningcited by 35

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Quine: Realizing LLM Agents as Native POSIX Processes
  2. 2025Astraea: A State-Aware Scheduling Engine for LLM-Powered Agents
  3. 2026From Agent Loops to Structured Graphs:A Scheduler-Theoretic Framework for LLM Agent Execution
  4. 2026Towards an Agent Operating System - Lessons from Classical and Cloud OS
  5. 2026Architecting AgentOS: From Token-Level Context to Emergent System-Level Intelligence
  6. 2026Agent Operating Systems (AOS): Integrating Agentic Control Planes into, and Beyond, Traditional Operating Systems
  7. 2025Autellix: An Efficient Serving Engine for LLM Agents as General Programs
  8. 2026MARS: Efficient, Adaptive Co-Scheduling for Heterogeneous Agentic Systems