Two Causes, Not One: Rethinking Omission and Fabrication Hallucinations in MLLMs
On the map: LLM reasoning → Hallucination detection and mitigation
Abstract (arXiv)
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved impressive advances, yet object hallucination remains a persistent challenge. Existing methods, based on the flawed assumption that omission and fabrication hallucinations share a common cause, often reduce omissions only to trigger more fabrications. In this work, we overturn this view by demonstrating that omission hallucinations arise from insufficient confidence when mapping perceived visual features to linguistic expressions, whereas fabrication hallucinations result from spurious associations within the cross-modal representation space due to statistical biases in the training corpus. Building on findings from visual attention intervention experiments, we propose the Visual-Semantic Attention Potential Field, a conceptual framework that reveals how the model constructs visual evidence to infer the presence or absence of objects. Leveraging this insight, we introduce Visual Potential Field Calibration (VPFC), a plug-and-play hallucination mitigation method that effectively reduces omission hallucinations without introducing additional fabrication hallucinations. Our findings reveal a critical oversight in current object hallucination research and chart new directions for developing more robust and balanced hallucination mitigation strategies.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Hallucination detection and mitigation, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 11 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2025.
Builds on
11 of 22 references.
References · 11
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2023MiniGPT-4: Enhancing Vision-Language Understanding with Advanced Large Language Modelscited by 2,711
- 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,224
- 2023MME: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 1,652
- 2024DeepSeek-V3 Technical Reportcited by 811
- 2022Discovering Latent Knowledge in Language Models Without Supervisioncited by 767
- 2024HALC: Object Hallucination Reduction via Adaptive Focal-Contrast Decodingcited by 174
- 2024Self-Introspective Decoding: Alleviating Hallucinations for Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 94
- 2025Your Large Vision-Language Model Only Needs A Few Attention Heads For Visual Groundingcited by 83
- 2024VaLiD: Mitigating the Hallucination of Large Vision Language Models by Visual Layer Fusion Contrastive Decodingcited by 12
- 2025The Mirage of Performance Gains: Why Contrastive Decoding Fails to Mitigate Object Hallucinations in MLLMs?cited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Multi-Object Hallucination in Vision-Language Models
- 2024Devils in Middle Layers of Large Vision-Language Models: Interpreting, Detecting and Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Attention Lens
- 2026Tone Matters: The Impact of Linguistic Tone on Hallucination in VLMs
- 2026Rethinking Visual Neglect: Steering via Context-Preference for MLLM Hallucination Mitigation
- 2024Skip n: A Simple Method to Reduce Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models
- 2025MIHBench: Benchmarking and Mitigating Multi-Image Hallucinations in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2024Visual Hallucination: Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediations
- 2026Reducing Object Hallucination in LVLMs via Emphasizing Image-negative Tokens