Is this chart lying to me? Automating the detection of misleading visualizations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Misleading visualizations are a potent driver of misinformation on social media and the web. By violating chart design principles, they distort data and lead readers to draw inaccurate conclusions. Prior work has shown that both humans and multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are frequently deceived by such visualizations. Automatically detecting misleading visualizations and identifying the specific design rules they violate could help protect readers and reduce the spread of misinformation. However, the training and evaluation of AI models has been limited by the absence of large, diverse, and openly available datasets. In this work, we introduce Misviz, a benchmark of 2,604 real-world visualizations annotated with 12 types of misleaders. To support model training, we also create Misviz-synth, a synthetic dataset of 57,665 visualizations generated using Matplotlib and based on real-world data tables. We perform a comprehensive evaluation on both datasets using state-of-the-art MLLMs, rule-based systems, and image-axis classifiers. Our results reveal that the task remains highly challenging. We release Misviz, Misviz-synth, and the accompanying code.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2025.
Builds on
16 of 50 references.
References · 16
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
- 2025InternVL3: Exploring Advanced Training and Test-Time Recipes for Open-Source Multimodal Modelscited by 1,834
- 2022ChartQA: A Benchmark for Question Answering about Charts with Visual and Logical Reasoningcited by 1,479
- 2020TAPAS: Weakly Supervised Table Parsing via Pre-trainingcited by 434
- 2019TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verificationcited by 428
- 2019The VIA Annotation Software for Images, Audio and Videocited by 167
- 2022DePlot: One-shot visual language reasoning by plot-to-table translationcited by 160
- 2024TinyChart: Efficient Chart Understanding with Visual Token Merging and Program-of-Thoughts Learningcited by 52
- 2024How Good (Or Bad) Are LLMs at Detecting Misleading Visualizations?cited by 27
- 2021VizLinter: A Linter and Fixer Framework for Data Visualizationcited by 20
- 2025Benchmarking Visual Language Models on Standardized Visualization Literacy Testscited by 20
4 more
- 2020Surfacing Visualization Miragescited by 17
- 2025Unmasking Deceptive Visuals: Benchmarking Multimodal Large Language Models on Misleading Chart Question Answeringcited by 16
- 2024"I Came Across a Junk": Understanding Design Flaws of Data Visualization from the Public's Perspectivecited by 9
- 2025Protecting multimodal large language models against misleading visualizationscited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 6.
6 papers.
- 2026When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?cited by 2
- 2026ChartAttack: Testing the Vulnerability of LLMs to Malicious Prompting in Chart Generationcited by 0
- 2026When Visuals Aren't the Problem: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Misleading Data Visualizationscited by 0
- 2026VizAnchor: Decoding Manipulation Intent from Tampering Visualizations via Dual-Anchor Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026VisAudit: Evaluating Multimodal Agents for Visual Diagnosis and Repaircited by 0
- 2026When Charts Deceive Web Agents: A Paired Benchmark for Misleading Visualization-Grounded Taskscited by 0
- 2026When Charts Deceive Web Agents: A Paired Benchmark for Misleading Visualization-Grounded Tasks9 Oct 2026
- 2026VisAudit: Evaluating Multimodal Agents for Visual Diagnosis and Repair1 Oct 2026
- 2026VizAnchor: Decoding Manipulation Intent from Tampering Visualizations via Dual-Anchor Reasoning25 Aug 2026
- 2026When AI reviews science: Can we trust the referee?26 Apr 2026
- 2026When Visuals Aren't the Problem: Evaluating Vision-Language Models on Misleading Data Visualizations23 Mar 2026
- 2026ChartAttack: Testing the Vulnerability of LLMs to Malicious Prompting in Chart Generation19 Jan 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025The Perils of Chart Deception: How Misleading Visualizations Affect Vision-Language Models
- 2026Chart Deception in Vision-Language Models: From Vulnerability to Mitigation
- 2026True (VIS) Lies: Analyzing How Generative AI Recognizes Intentionality, Rhetoric, and Misleadingness in Visualization Lies
- 2024CHARTOM: A Visual Theory-of-Mind Benchmark for LLMs on Misleading Charts
- 2024Can GPT-4 Models Detect Misleading Visualizations?
- 2026De-rendering, Reasoning, and Repairing Charts with Vision-Language Models
- 2026Do Large Language Models Understand Data Visualization Principles?
- 2026Chart-Supported or Model-Supplied? Examining MLLM-Generated Claims for Accessible Visualization