mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Lightweight MRI-Based Automated Segmentation of Pancreatic Cancer with Auto3DSeg

arXiv 2508.21227 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurate delineation of pancreatic tumors is critical for diagnosis, treatment planning, and outcome assessment, yet automated segmentation remains challenging due to anatomical variability and limited dataset availability. In this study, SegResNet models, as part of the Auto3DSeg architecture, were trained and evaluated on two MRI-based pancreatic tumor segmentation tasks as part of the 2025 PANTHER Challenge. Algorithm methodology included 5-fold cross-validation with STAPLE ensembling after focusing on an anatomically relevant region-of-interest. The Pancreatic Tumor Segmentation on Diagnostic MRI task 1 training set included 91 T1-weighted arterial contrast-enhanced MRI with expert annotated pancreas and tumor labels. The Pancreatic Tumor Segmentation on MR-Linac task 2 training set used 50 T2-weighted MR-Linac cases with expert annotated pancreas and tumor labels. Algorithm-automated segmentation performance of pancreatic tumor was assessed using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), 5 mm DSC, 95th percentile Hausdorff Distance (HD95), Mean Average Surface Distance (MASD), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). For Task 1, the algorithm achieved a DSC of 0.56, 5 mm DSC of 0.73, HD95 of 41.1 mm, MASD of 26.0 mm, and RMSE of 5164 mm. For Task 2, performance decreased, with a DSC of 0.33, 5 mm DSC of 0.50, HD95 of 20.1 mm, MASD of 7.2 mm, and RMSE of 17,203 mm. These findings illustrate the challenges of MRI-based pancreatic tumor segmentation with small datasets, highlighting variability introduced by different MRI sequences. Despite modest performance, the results demonstrate potential for automated delineation and emphasize the need for larger, standardized MRI datasets to improve model robustness and clinical utility.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2025.

Builds on

4 of 19 references.

References · 4

  1. 2022Swin UNETR: Swin Transformers for Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumors in MRI Imagescited by 830
  2. 20183D MRI brain tumor segmentation using autoencoder regularizationcited by 328
  3. 2021DiNTS: Differentiable Neural Network Topology Search for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 48
  4. 2023Automated 3D Segmentation of Kidneys and Tumors in MICCAI KiTS 2023 Challengecited by 19

Built on by

Not cited yet.