mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

GCAV: A Global Concept Activation Vector Framework for Cross-Layer Consistency in Interpretability

arXiv 2508.21197 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2025cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs) provide a powerful approach for interpreting deep neural networks by quantifying their sensitivity to human-defined concepts. However, when computed independently at different layers, CAVs often exhibit inconsistencies, making cross-layer comparisons unreliable. To address this issue, we propose the Global Concept Activation Vector (GCAV), a novel framework that unifies CAVs into a single, semantically consistent representation. Our method leverages contrastive learning to align concept representations across layers and employs an attention-based fusion mechanism to construct a globally integrated CAV. By doing so, our method significantly reduces the variance in TCAV scores while preserving concept relevance, ensuring more stable and reliable concept attributions. To evaluate the effectiveness of GCAV, we introduce Testing with Global Concept Activation Vectors (TGCAV) as a method to apply TCAV to GCAV-based representations. We conduct extensive experiments on multiple deep neural networks, demonstrating that our method effectively mitigates concept inconsistency across layers, enhances concept localization, and improves robustness against adversarial perturbations. By integrating cross-layer information into a coherent framework, our method offers a more comprehensive and interpretable understanding of how deep learning models encode human-defined concepts. Code and models are available at https://github.com/Zhenghao-He/GCAV.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2025.

Builds on

23 of 32 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  4. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  5. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  6. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,795
  7. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  8. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  9. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  10. 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,079
  11. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  12. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
11 more
  1. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,319
  2. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,032
  3. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 708
  4. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
  5. 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 497
  6. 2020Concept Whitening for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 225
  7. 2018Representer Point Selection for Explaining Deep Neural Networkscited by 187
  8. 2019Explaining Classifiers with Causal Concept Effect (CaCE)cited by 135
  9. 2024Visual-TCAV: Concept-based Attribution and Saliency Maps for Post-hoc Explainability in Image Classificationcited by 12
  10. 2023Concept Distillation: Leveraging Human-Centered Explanations for Model Improvementcited by 10
  11. 2021Making Corgis Important for Honeycomb Classification: Adversarial Attacks on Concept-based Explainability Toolscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.